To require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

H.R.1569 through Congress

H.R.1569 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

HouseMay 8, 1997IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No Senate action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related Senate measures (1)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the Senate stage of H.R.1569.

Related Senate bill: S.639 A bill to require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 8, 1997

Amends part D (Child Support and Establishment of Paternity) of title IV of the Social Security Act to revise distribution guidelines for child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept on behalf of a family. Requires the same distribution of arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States (namely, first to the family, and only then to the State to reimburse prior welfare expenditures). Repeals the State and Federal priority for retaining assigned child support arrearages collected from Federal tax refund offsets. Mandates that the State agency distribute such arrearages in accordance with the priorities revised under this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Johnson, Nancy L. [R-CT-6] · R–CT

Committees

Ways and Means Committee

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 8, 1997
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
May 8, 1997
Introduced in House
May 8, 1997
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · May 8, 1997 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

S 639 · A bill to require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1569 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1569, 105th Congress: To require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1569

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1569/BILLS-105hr1569ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T16:40:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.1569 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1569 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1569, 105th Congress: To require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1569

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1569/BILLS-105hr1569ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T16:40:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1569 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1569 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1569, 105th Congress: To require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1569

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1569/BILLS-105hr1569ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T16:40:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1569 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1569 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1569, 105th Congress: To require the same distribution of child support arrearages collected by Federal tax intercept as collected directly by the States, and for other purposes.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/1569

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1997-05-08.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hr1569/BILLS-105hr1569ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2024-02-07T16:40:30Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1569 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.