Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 24, 2025
Promoting Responsible and Effective Virtual Experiences through Novel Technology to Deliver Improved Access and Better Engagement with Tested and Evidence-based Strategies Act or the PREVENT DIABETES Act
This bill allows health care entities to provide virtual services under the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program for an additional three years.
The Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program offers Medicare beneficiaries who are at risk of developing Type 2 diabetes specialized training and education regarding diet, exercise, and other behavioral changes. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued temporary authorization for entities participating in the program to provide these services virtually until December 31, 2027.
The bill extends the authorization for virtual services until December 31, 2030.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
Source last updated: Jul 21, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1523 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1523 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1523 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1523 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 1, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-24 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposed PREVENT DIABETES Act would let qualifying providers offer the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program entirely online, through live sessions or services that do not require simultaneous participation. It would prevent a participant’s out-of-state location alone from blocking a provider’s payment claim and allow people to enroll repeatedly. These rules would apply from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2030.
Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Promoting Responsible and Effective Virtual Experiences through Novel Technology to Deliver Improved Access and Better Engagement with Tested and Evidence-based Strategies Act or the PREVENT DIABETES Act.
for the period beginning January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2030— (1) an entity may participate in the MDPP by offering only online MDPP services via synchronous or asynchronous technology or telecommunications if such entity meets the conditions for enrollment as an MDPP supplier
the entity shall not be prohibited from submitting a claim for payment for such services solely by reason of the location of such beneficiary at such time; and (3) no limit is applied on the number of times an individual may enroll in the MDPP.
The bill would require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise the specified federal regulations by January 1, 2026. The required rules would cover the five-year period ending December 31, 2030.
Check the sources
Not later than January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall revise the regulations under parts 410 and 424 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, to provide that, for the period beginning January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2030
Providers could participate by offering only online program services, but they would still have to meet the supplier enrollment conditions in the referenced regulation or its successor. The bill would permit both live and asynchronous delivery, meaning delivery that does not require the provider and participant to take part at the same time.
Check the source
an entity may participate in the MDPP by offering only online MDPP services via synchronous or asynchronous technology or telecommunications if such entity meets the conditions for enrollment as an MDPP supplier (as specified in section 424.205(b) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation))
For providers participating through the online-only option, the administrative location would be the address on file with the Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program.
Check the source
if an entity participates in the MDPP in the manner described in paragraph (1)— (A) the administrative location of such entity shall be the address of the entity on file under the Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program
An online-only provider could not be barred from submitting a payment claim solely because the participant was in another state when receiving the services. This protects the ability to submit a claim; it does not guarantee payment or remove other payment requirements.
Check the sources
if an entity participates in the MDPP in the manner described in paragraph (1)
in the case of online MDPP services furnished by such entity to an MDPP beneficiary who was not located in the same State as the entity at the time such services were furnished, the entity shall not be prohibited from submitting a claim for payment for such services solely by reason of the location of such beneficiary at such time
During the specified period, the program could not limit how many times a person enrolls. This provision is written for the program generally, without restricting it to online participants.
Check the sources
for the period beginning January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2030
The supplied action snapshot, updated July 21, 2026, records introduction in the House on February 24, 2025, and referral that day to the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees for consideration of provisions within their respective jurisdictions.
2025-02-24: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-24. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying materials needed to assess formal earmark status were not supplied.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow preferential carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. The participation and claim-submission rules concern access to the program and do not alone establish preferential treatment. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
What this analysis cannot establish
The supplied full text is the introduced version. The action snapshot documents introduction and referrals but does not establish passage, enactment, or implementation. Missing later actions do not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
The referenced statutes, regulations, and regulatory definitions are not reproduced. The bundle therefore does not establish the full supplier enrollment requirements, participant eligibility rules, payment conditions, or how these proposals differ from all existing program rules.
The proposed January 1, 2026 deadline does not establish that regulations were actually revised. The bundle does not explain how implementation would work if enactment occurred after that date.
The source set contains no member earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or amendment attachment history. It cannot establish formal earmark status or provisions in other versions.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jul 21, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI