PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Accounts.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 29, 1993
Prohibits appropriations for the legislative branch for FY 1994 from exceeding 75 percent of such appropriations for FY 1993. Requires Congress to give consideration to reductions that may be achieved by eliminating duplicative services in congressional operations, with particular emphasis on consolidation of all legal services of the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the Library of Congress.
People & committees
Rep. Dickey, Jay [R-AR-4] · R–AR
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Accounts.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Libraries and Memorials.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Personnel and Police.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1691)
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1505 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1505 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1505 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1505 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.