Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H845)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 21, 2025
Agricultural and Forestry Hauling Efficiency Act
This bill allows Virginia to increase the vehicle weight limit for covered agricultural vehicles traveling on interstate highways to 90,000 pounds. Specifically, Virginia may provide a special permit for these covered agricultural vehicles to operate on interstate highways in Virginia.
The term covered agricultural vehicle means a vehicle that is transporting (1) unprocessed agricultural crops used for food, feed, or fiber; or (2) raw or unfinished forest products, including logs, pulpwood, rough-sawn green lumber, biomass, or wood chips.
Under current law, there is an 80,000 pound overall gross vehicle weight limit for interstate highways, with exceptions. Virginia allows certain agricultural vehicles that do not exceed 90,000 pounds to travel on Virginia highways that are not part of the interstate highway system.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Oct 11, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1487 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1487 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1487 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1487 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 1, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-21 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
This bill would let Virginia allow, by special permit, vehicles weighing up to 90,000 pounds to carry qualifying agricultural and forest products on interstate highways within the state. It would cover vehicles hauling unprocessed crops for food, feed or fiber, and raw or unfinished forest products. Virginia could choose whether to allow these vehicles.
Check the sources
The Commonwealth of Virginia may allow, by special permit, the operation of a covered agricultural vehicle on the Interstate System in the Commonwealth of Virginia if such vehicle does not exceed 90,000 pounds.
the term covered agricultural vehicle means a vehicle that is transporting unprocessed agricultural crops used for food, feed or fiber, or raw or unfinished forest products, including logs, pulpwood, rough-sawn green lumber, biomass, or wood chips.
Section 2 would add a Virginia-specific exception to the federal vehicle-weight statute. Permission would require a special permit, would apply only on Virginia's interstate highways, and would be limited to qualifying vehicles weighing no more than 90,000 pounds.
Check the sources
Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (z) Exception for agricultural vehicles in Commonwealth of Virginia
The Commonwealth of Virginia may allow, by special permit, the operation of a covered agricultural vehicle on the Interstate System in the Commonwealth of Virginia if such vehicle does not exceed 90,000 pounds.
Eligibility would depend on the cargo being transported. Covered forest products expressly include logs, pulpwood, rough-sawn green lumber, biomass and wood chips; covered crops must be unprocessed and used for food, feed or fiber.
Check the source
the term covered agricultural vehicle means a vehicle that is transporting unprocessed agricultural crops used for food, feed or fiber, or raw or unfinished forest products, including logs, pulpwood, rough-sawn green lumber, biomass, or wood chips.
The supplied October 11, 2025 source snapshot records introduction and referral to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and its Highways and Transit Subcommittee on February 21, 2025. It also records sponsor introductory remarks on February 26, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-10-11T08:05:13Z.
2025-02-26: Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H845)
2025-02-21: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
2025-02-21: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
2025-02-21: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-21. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials, and does not establish formal earmark status.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
Findings to examine
The narrow statutory exception warrants scrutiny as a targeted benefit; this classification is not a judgment about its merits.
Operators hauling qualifying agricultural or forest products in Virginia could receive permission by special permit to operate vehicles weighing up to 90,000 pounds on the state's interstate highways. This proposed exception is limited by geography, cargo and vehicle weight, with permission left to Virginia. It constitutes the bill's main policy.
Check the sources
Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (z) Exception for agricultural vehicles in Commonwealth of Virginia
The Commonwealth of Virginia may allow, by special permit, the operation of a covered agricultural vehicle on the Interstate System in the Commonwealth of Virginia if such vehicle does not exceed 90,000 pounds.
the term covered agricultural vehicle means a vehicle that is transporting unprocessed agricultural crops used for food, feed or fiber, or raw or unfinished forest products, including logs, pulpwood, rough-sawn green lumber, biomass, or wood chips.
The supplied full text is the introduced version. Its provisions are proposals; the supplied history does not establish enactment or rule out later action.
The existing text of 23 U.S.C. 127 is not supplied, so the current weight limits, other exceptions and interaction with existing requirements cannot be fully assessed.
The proposal specifies no implementation date, expiration date, detailed permit procedures or separate enforcement provisions.
No member earmark disclosures, committee reports or conference materials are supplied; formal earmark status cannot be independently established.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Oct 11, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI