PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1463 / 119th Congress

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce a final rule of the Food and Drug Administration relating to "Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests", and for other purposes.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 21, 2025

This bill prohibits the use of federal funds to implement, administer, or enforce the final rule issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) titled Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests and published on May 6, 2024, or any substantially similar rule. 

The rule specifies that laboratory developed tests (medical screening tests developed by laboratories rather than medical device manufacturers) are medical devices subject to FDA regulation with limited exceptions. Prior to the rule, the FDA had exercised discretion as to whether to apply regulations for medical devices to laboratory developed tests.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1] · R–MN

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 9, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1463 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1463 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1463 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1463 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 1, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-21 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This bill would prevent federal money from being used to carry out or enforce a specified Food and Drug Administration rule concerning laboratory-developed tests, or any substantially similar rule. It proposes a funding restriction on federal regulatory activity; the supplied text does not establish that this restriction became law.

Check the sources
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the final rule of the Food and Drug Administration relating to Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-21
or any substantially similar rule.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-21

How it would work

The proposed prohibition would apply despite any other provision of law and would cover implementation, administration, and enforcement. It identifies the targeted rule by its May 6, 2024 submission for Federal Register publication and citation, 89 Fed. Reg. 37286, and extends the restriction to substantially similar rules.

Check the source
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the final rule of the Food and Drug Administration relating to Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests that was submitted for publication in the Federal Register on May 6, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 37286), or any substantially similar rule.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-21

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated August 9, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on February 21, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-08-09T08:05:49Z. 2025-02-21: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. 2025-02-21: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-08-09T08:05:49Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-21. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and accompanying committee materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No separate narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The referenced FDA rule is not supplied, so its requirements, coverage, and practical consequences cannot be determined from this bundle.
  • The bill does not define “substantially similar” or specify an implementation date, expiration date, exceptions, or a separate enforcement mechanism.
  • The supplied history does not establish legislative developments after the dated snapshot or whether the proposal became law. Missing actions do not prove that it never advanced or was never enacted.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Aug 9, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI