PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-59.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2001
Great Falls Historic District Study Act of 2001 - Requires the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating the Great Falls Historic District in Paterson, New Jersey, as a unit of the National Park System.
People & committees
Rep. Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [D-NJ-8] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-59.
Became Public Law No: 107-59.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10799, S10801)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10799, S10801)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 176.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. With written report No. 107-74.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. With written report No. 107-74.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR H2051)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR H2051)
RESERVATION OF OBJECTION - The House proceeded with debate under a reservation of objection.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H2051)
Mr. Hefley asked unanimous consent to discharge the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union and consider.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 30.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-47.
Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-47.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands.
Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.146 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.146 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.146 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.146 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.