To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require candidates for election to the House of Representatives or Senate to raise not less than 50 percent of their contributions from residents of the States the candidates seek to represent and not less than 50 percent of their contributions from individuals, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 4, 2001
Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require candidates for election to the House of Representatives or the Senate to raise not less than 50 percent of their total contributions from individuals, and not less than 50 percent of their total contributions from residents of the State in which the congressional district or Senate seat involved is located.Prohibits a person from making a contribution through an intermediary or conduit, except that a person may facilitate a contribution by providing: (1) advice to another person on how the other person may make a contribution; and (2) addressed mailing material or similar items to another person for use by the other person in making a contribution.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1445 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1445 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1445 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1445 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.