Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 18, 2025
Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025
This bill repeals the excise tax imposed on wagers (also known as the handle tax) and the occupational tax imposed on businesses receiving taxable wagers.
As background, an excise tax on wagers is imposed on businesses that accept wagers, persons conducting a wagering pool or lottery, and certain persons accepting wagers on behalf of another person. Under current law, the amount of the excise tax is (1) 0.25% of the amount wagered (also known as the handle) for wagers authorized by the state, or (2) 2% of the amount wagered for wagers not authorized by the state. (Some exceptions apply.)
Further, under current law, an annual occupational tax is imposed in the amount of (1) $50 for persons in the business of accepting taxable wagers (or persons accepting taxable wagers on such persons’ behalf) in a state where the wagers are authorized, or (2) $500 for such persons in states where the wagers are not authorized. (Some exceptions apply.)
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: May 6, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1440 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1440 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1440 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1440 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 1, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-18 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposed Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025 would repeal the federal tax-code chapter on wagering, meaning betting. It would affect taxpayers subject to that chapter’s taxes. The supplied bill does not reproduce the existing rules, so it does not show the specific taxes or taxpayer categories that would be affected.
Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025.
The bill would repeal Chapter 35 in its entirety. The repeal would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024; this is a proposed application date, not evidence that the repeal took effect.
Check the source
(a) In general Chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxes on wagering) is repealed. (b) Effective date The amendment made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated May 6, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 18, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-05-06T13:57:53Z.
2025-02-18: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
2025-02-18: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential exception was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and the statutory context supplied.
What this analysis cannot establish
The bundle supplies the complete introduced bill, but not the existing Chapter 35. Its tax rates, taxpayer coverage, exceptions, and administrative requirements cannot be determined from this evidence.
The supplied history does not establish subsequent action or enactment. The absence of later entries does not prove that the bill never advanced or became law.
No earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied; the category reviews are limited to the introduced text.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: May 6, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI