To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of the child tax credit, to make such credit fully refundable, to remove income limitations from such credit, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
No official summary is available in the imported record yet.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: May 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1425 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1425 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1425 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1425 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 31, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-18 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
This proposal would change the federal child tax credit by replacing the $1,000 amount in the cited tax-code provision with $5,000 and deleting the subsection identified as income limitations. It would also remove related provisions and revise a rule for American Samoa. The changes would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Check the sources
(a) Increase in credit amount Section 24(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking $1,000 and inserting $5,000. (b) Removal of income limitations Section 24 of such Code is amended by striking subsection (b).
(ii) Application of section in event of absence of approved plan In the case of a taxable year with respect to which a plan is not approved under subparagraph (B), rules similar to the rules of paragraph (2) shall apply with respect to bona fide residents of American Samoa (within the meaning of section 937(a)).
The bill would replace $1,000 with $5,000 in section 24(a), the child tax credit provision. It would also delete section 24(b), under the heading “Removal of income limitations.” These are proposed changes to the cited statutory language; the supplied text does not reproduce the full eligibility rules.
Check the source
1. Child tax credit improvements (a) Increase in credit amount Section 24(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking $1,000 and inserting $5,000. (b) Removal of income limitations Section 24 of such Code is amended by striking subsection (b).
The bill would delete subsections 24(i) and 24(j), along with paragraphs 24(h)(2) and 24(h)(3). The bill labels these changes as cleanup and related adjustments, but does not reproduce the provisions being deleted.
Check the sources
(c) Removal of deadwood (1) Section 24 of such Code is amended by striking subsections (i) and (j).
The bill would remove subparagraph 24(k)(2)(A) and the label and heading for subparagraph (B). It would also remove a phrase in section 24(k)(3)(A) concerning how the credit applies to qualifying residents of Puerto Rico. The surrounding statutory rules are not supplied.
Check the sources
(2) Section 24(k)(2) of such Code is amended— (A) by striking subparagraph (A), and (B) by striking (B) Application to taxable years after 2021..
(3) Section 24(k)(3)(A) of such Code is amended by striking and without regard to the application of this section to bona fide residents of Puerto Rico under subsection (i)(1).
For a tax year without a plan approved under section 24(k)(3)(B), the bill would require rules similar to those in paragraph (2) to apply to American Samoa residents who meet the residency definition in section 937(a). The supplied bill does not reproduce those rules, the plan requirements, or the residency definition.
Check the source
(4) Section 24(k)(3)(C)(ii) of such Code is amended to read as follows: (ii) Application of section in event of absence of approved plan In the case of a taxable year with respect to which a plan is not approved under subparagraph (B), rules similar to the rules of paragraph (2) shall apply with respect to bona fide residents of American Samoa (within the meaning of section 937(a)).
The bill would repeal tax-code section 7527A and remove its entry from the chapter’s table of sections. The supplied text does not describe that section’s current operation.
Check the source
(5) Chapter 77 of such Code is amended by striking section 7527A (and by striking the item relating to such section in the table of sections for such chapter).
The official-actions snapshot updated May 7, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 18, 2025. This snapshot does not establish subsequent legislative action or enactment.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-05-07T12:37:00Z.
2025-02-18: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
2025-02-18: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for a particular recipient or place was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow preferential carve-out or special exemption was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited by the missing statutory context and does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.
What this analysis cannot establish
The supplied full text is the introduced version. Its proposed changes should not be treated as enacted law. The dated actions snapshot does not establish whether the bill later advanced, changed, or became law.
The existing tax-code provisions are not reproduced in full. The bundle therefore does not establish the complete before-and-after rules for eligibility, credit amounts, refunds when a credit exceeds tax owed, territorial administration, or the provisions proposed for deletion.
No fiscal estimates or implementation analysis are supplied, so revenue effects, household outcomes, and administrative effects cannot be established.
The Riders & Targeted Benefits review is limited to the supplied introduced text. Member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, and other versions are not supplied.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: May 7, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI