PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 18, 2025
Guard and Reserve GI Bill Parity Act of 2025
This bill expands eligibility for Post-9/11 educational assistance for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces and members of the National Guard. Specifically, the bill expands the types of activities that count towards Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility to include active duty, inactive-duty training, annual training duty, and full-time National Guard duty or active duty. (Generally, under current law, only federal active duty counts towards educational assistance eligibility.)
People & committees
Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity.
Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
Source last updated: Sep 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1423 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1423 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1423 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1423 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
PlainBill explanation
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-18 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
The proposed Guard and Reserve GI Bill Parity Act of 2025 would broaden which military service counts toward Post-9/11 education benefits for reserve-component members, including the National Guard. It would include inactive-duty training, annual training, and specified National Guard duty. The changes would take effect one year after enactment and cover service performed since September 11, 2001, with a separate rule governing time limits for using benefits.
This Act may be cited as the Guard and Reserve GI Bill Parity Act of 2025.
In the case of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces— (i) service on active duty (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10), inactive-duty training (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10), or annual training duty;
(ii) in the National Guard when performing full-time National Guard duty (as defined in section 101 of title 32); or (iii) in the National Guard when performing active duty (as defined in section 101 of title 32).
(b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Retroactive applicability The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to service performed on or after September 11, 2001.
Section 3321(a) of title 38, United States Code, shall apply to entitlement to educational assistance acquired as a result of the amendments made by subsection (a) as if such amendments had been enacted immediately after the enactment of the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–252).
For reserve-component members, the bill would replace the relevant service definition with two alternatives. The first includes active duty, inactive-duty training, and annual training. The second covers active duty under the listed statutory call-up authorities and expressly excludes inactive-duty training and annual training within that alternative.
Section 3301(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (1) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows: (B) In the case of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces— (i) service on active duty (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10), inactive-duty training (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10), or annual training duty; or (ii) service on active duty under a call or order to active duty under section 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12301(h), 12302, 12304, 12304a, or 12304b of title 10 or section 3713 of title 14, but not including inactive duty training (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10) or annual training duty.
For National Guard members, the bill would replace an existing clause with two categories of service: full-time National Guard duty and active duty, each using the definitions in title 32 of the United States Code.
(B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following new clauses: (ii) in the National Guard when performing full-time National Guard duty (as defined in section 101 of title 32); or (iii) in the National Guard when performing active duty (as defined in section 101 of title 32).
The eligibility amendments would take effect one year after enactment. The bill does not set a fixed calendar date for implementation.
(b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
The eligibility amendments would apply to service performed on or after September 11, 2001, allowing earlier service to fall within the expanded rules once they take effect.
(c) Retroactive applicability The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to service performed on or after September 11, 2001.
For education benefits acquired through these amendments, the existing statutory time-limit rule would apply as though the amendments had been enacted immediately after the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008. This provision does not itself state a specific deadline for using those benefits.
(d) Application of time limitation for use of entitlement Section 3321(a) of title 38, United States Code, shall apply to entitlement to educational assistance acquired as a result of the amendments made by subsection (a) as if such amendments had been enacted immediately after the enactment of the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–252).
The source snapshot updated September 19, 2026 records introduction and referral to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs on February 18, 2025; referral to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity and hearings on March 10; and a subcommittee markup and forwarding to the full committee by voice vote on April 9. Forwarding to the full committee is the latest action listed in that snapshot.
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-19T23:31:57Z. 2025-04-09: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote. 2025-04-09: Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held 2025-03-10: Subcommittee Hearings Held 2025-03-10: Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity. 2025-02-18: Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. 2025-02-18: Introduced in House
A closer look
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; formal earmark status cannot be established for other versions or accompanying materials.
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential exception beyond the main policy's intended beneficiaries was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 19, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI