PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1408 / 119th Congress

Affordable Child Care Act

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Davids, Sharice [D-KS-3] · D–KS

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
8 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 25, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1408 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1408 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1408 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1408 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Nov 1, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-18 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed Affordable Child Care Act would double specified federal tax amounts affecting people using the child and dependent care credit or programs that provide dependent care assistance, and employers using the employer-provided childcare credit. These changes would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024. Doubling these statutory amounts does not necessarily double anyone’s actual tax savings.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Affordable Child Care Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
2. Child and dependent care credit doubled (a) In general Section 21(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking $3,000 and inserting $6,000, and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking $6,000 and inserting $12,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
3. Dependent care assistance program limit doubled (a) In general Section 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking $5,000 ($2,500 and inserting $10,000 (half such dollar amount), and (2) by striking subparagraph (D).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
4. Employer-provided childcare credit doubled (a) In general Section 45F(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking $150,000 and inserting $300,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

How it would work

For the child and dependent care credit, the bill would replace $3,000 with $6,000 in section 21(c)(1) and $6,000 with $12,000 in section 21(c)(2). These are changes to specified statutory amounts; the bill does not reproduce the surrounding rules governing their use.

Check the source
2. Child and dependent care credit doubled (a) In general Section 21(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking $3,000 and inserting $6,000, and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking $6,000 and inserting $12,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

The bill would also delete subsection (g) of section 21 and redesignate subsection (h) as subsection (g). The deleted subsection’s content is not supplied, so its substantive effect cannot be determined from this bundle.

Check the source
(b) Conforming amendment Section 21 of such Code is amended by striking subsection (g) and redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (g).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

For dependent care assistance programs, the bill would replace the $5,000 amount with $10,000 and replace the parenthetical $2,500 amount with half the new amount, or $5,000. It would also delete section 129(a)(2)(D). That provision’s content is not supplied, so the substantive effect of its deletion cannot be determined from this bundle.

Check the source
3. Dependent care assistance program limit doubled (a) In general Section 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking $5,000 ($2,500 and inserting $10,000 (half such dollar amount), and (2) by striking subparagraph (D).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

For the employer-provided childcare credit, the bill would increase the dollar amount in section 45F(b) from $150,000 to $300,000. The surrounding credit calculation and eligibility rules are not reproduced.

Check the source
4. Employer-provided childcare credit doubled (a) In general Section 45F(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking $150,000 and inserting $300,000.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

All amendments in sections 2 through 4 would apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Check the sources
(c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
(b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
(b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

What the record shows

The supplied action snapshot, updated August 25, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 18, 2025. It does not establish passage or enactment.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-08-25T08:05:45Z. 2025-02-18: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. 2025-02-18: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-08-25T08:05:45Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish attachment history or absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential exception was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. Ordinary coverage of intended program beneficiaries alone does not warrant a finding. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The bundle contains the complete introduced bill, but not the existing tax provisions it would amend. Eligibility, calculation rules, exceptions, administration, and the effects of the deleted provisions cannot be fully explained without that statutory context. Doubling specified amounts does not establish that actual tax savings would double.
  • The supplied text specifies when the amendments would begin to apply but gives no termination date. Any interaction with existing statutory timing rules is unresolved because those rules are not reproduced.
  • The dated action snapshot supplies no later legislative steps or enacted text. That absence does not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
  • No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied. The riders, earmarks, and targeted-benefits review is limited to the supplied introduced text; formal earmark status cannot be established from the source set.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Aug 25, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI