PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1407 / 119th Congress

Permanent Telehealth from Home Act

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 18, 2025

Permanent Telehealth from Home Act

This bill permanently allows any site to serve as an originating site (i.e., the location of the beneficiary) for purposes of Medicare telehealth services, including a beneficiary's home.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16] · R–FL

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 11, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1407 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1407 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1407 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1407 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 31, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-18 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed Permanent Telehealth from Home Act would remove a March 31, 2025 cutoff from two Medicare telehealth provisions concerning where patients can receive care remotely. Those provisions would instead apply after a referenced emergency period, without a new end date. The bill also would remove a condition requiring that emergency period to end before December 31, 2024. The existing Medicare rules are not reproduced, so the supplied text does not establish the full scope of services or patient locations covered.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Permanent Telehealth from Home Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
Removing geographic requirements and expanding originating sites for telehealth services under the Medicare program
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18
(A) by striking In the case that the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) ends before December 31, 2024, with and inserting With; and (B) by striking during the period beginning on the first day after the end of such emergency period and ending March 31, 2025 and inserting after the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B)
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

How it would work

Section 2 would make identical timing changes in paragraphs (2)(B)(iii) and (4)(C)(iii) of section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act. In both places, it would remove the condition that the referenced emergency period end before December 31, 2024, and replace the period ending March 31, 2025 with language applying after that emergency period. The replacement language specifies no new expiration date.

Check the source
Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii)— (A) by striking In the case that the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) ends before December 31, 2024, with and inserting With; and (B) by striking during the period beginning on the first day after the end of such emergency period and ending March 31, 2025 and inserting after the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B); and (2) in paragraph (4)(C)(iii)— (A) by striking In the case that the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) ends before December 31, 2024, with and inserting With; and (B) by striking during the period beginning on the first day after the end of such emergency period and ending March 31, 2025 and inserting after the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-18

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated September 11, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees on February 18, 2025. It does not establish subsequent passage or enactment.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-11T08:05:35Z.
Official legislative record · 2026-09-11T08:05:35Z
2025-02-18: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-09-11T08:05:35Z
2025-02-18: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2026-09-11T08:05:35Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The complete introduced bill is supplied, but the underlying Medicare provisions and the referenced emergency-period definition are not reproduced. Their full eligibility rules, exceptions, payment terms, and administrative requirements cannot be determined from this bundle.
  • The bill provides no separate effective-date clause. Its replacement language refers to the period after the defined emergency, but the supplied evidence does not establish that emergency's actual end date or resolve how enactment would affect earlier periods.
  • The supplied actions snapshot records only introduction and referrals. Missing later history does not prove that the bill never advanced or became law; the provisions here are analyzed as proposals.
  • No member earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied. The spending review cannot establish formal earmark status in those materials.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 11, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI