Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 14, 2025
Meat and Poultry Special Investigator Act
This bill establishes the Office of the Special Investigator for Competition Matters within the Agricultural Marketing Service's Packers and Stockyards Division.
Specifically, the office must use all available tools (e.g., subpoenas) to investigate and prosecute violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 (P&S Act). Further, the bill grants the office the authority to bring any civil or administrative action authorized by that act.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
Additionally, the office must
serve as a liaison to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission with respect to competition and trade practices in the food and agricultural sector,
consult with the Department of Homeland Security on national security and critical infrastructure security in the food and agricultural sector, and
maintain a staff of attorneys and other professionals with appropriate expertise.
As background, the purposes of the P&S Act are to assure fair competition and trade practices, safeguard farmers and ranchers, protect consumers, and protect livestock, meat, and poultry industry members from unfair, deceptive, unjustly discriminatory, and monopolistic practices. Those engaged in the business of marketing livestock, meat, and poultry in commerce are subject to the P&S Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1380 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1380 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1380 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1380 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 31, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-14 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
H.R. 1380 would create a special investigator’s office within the Department of Agriculture to investigate and pursue violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act. The proposal concerns enforcement affecting businesses covered by that law and coordination on competition, trade practices, and security in food and agriculture. It would give the investigator authority to bring civil cases and administrative enforcement proceedings authorized by that law.
Check the sources
The Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, is amended by inserting after section 415 (7 U.S.C. 228d) the following:
There is established within the Packers and Stockyards Division of the Department of Agriculture an office, to be known as the Office of the Special Investigator for Competition Matters
(2) serve as a Department of Agriculture liaison to, and act in consultation with, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission with respect to competition and trade practices in the food and agricultural sector; (3) act in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security with respect to national security and critical infrastructure security in the food and agricultural sector;
Section 2 would place the new office within the Department of Agriculture’s Packers and Stockyards Division. The Secretary of Agriculture would appoint the special investigator who heads it.
Check the sources
(a) Establishment There is established within the Packers and Stockyards Division of the Department of Agriculture an office, to be known as the Office of the Special Investigator for Competition Matters (referred to in this section as the Office).
The Office shall be headed by the Special Investigator for Competition Matters (referred to in this section as the Special Investigator), who shall be appointed by the Secretary.
The investigator would be required to use all available tools, including subpoenas—legal demands for evidence—to investigate and prosecute violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act.
Check the sources
The Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, is amended by inserting after section 415 (7 U.S.C. 228d) the following:
The investigator would serve as Agriculture’s liaison to the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission and consult with them about competition and trade practices in food and agriculture. The investigator would also consult with Homeland Security about national security and protection of critical infrastructure in that sector.
Check the source
(2) serve as a Department of Agriculture liaison to, and act in consultation with, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission with respect to competition and trade practices in the food and agricultural sector; (3) act in consultation with the Department of Homeland Security with respect to national security and critical infrastructure security in the food and agricultural sector;
The investigator could bring any civil case or administrative enforcement proceeding authorized by the Packers and Stockyards Act. This authority would apply despite conflicting provisions of title 28 of the United States Code; the bill does not reproduce those provisions.
Check the sources
The Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, is amended by inserting after section 415 (7 U.S.C. 228d) the following:
(d) Prosecutorial authority Notwithstanding title 28, United States Code, the Special Investigator shall have the authority to bring any civil or administrative action authorized under this Act.
The supplied actions snapshot, updated August 21, 2026, records introduction and referral to the House Committee on Agriculture on February 14, 2025, followed by referral to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry on March 20, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-08-21T08:05:43Z.
2025-03-20: Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
2025-02-14: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
2025-02-14: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-14. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
What this analysis cannot establish
This analysis describes the complete supplied introduced text dated February 14, 2025, as a proposal, not enacted law. The supplied actions snapshot does not establish whether the bill later advanced, changed, or became law.
The existing Packers and Stockyards Act and title 28 are not reproduced. The evidence therefore does not establish the full scope of covered businesses, underlying violations, remedies, procedural limits, or the precise changes to existing enforcement arrangements.
The supplied text specifies no funding amount, staffing level, implementation date, or termination condition. It does not establish the office’s eventual cost or enforcement results.
No earmark disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied, limiting conclusions about formal earmark status outside the bill text.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Aug 21, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI