PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.137 / 110th Congress

Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act of 2007

Became Public Law No: 110-22.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · May 3, 2007

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on March 26, 2007. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act of 2007 - Amends the federal criminal code to impose a fine and/or prison term of up to three years for violations of the Animal Welfare Act relating to: (1) sponsoring or exhibiting an animal in an animal fighting venture; (2) buying, selling, transporting, delivering, or receiving for purposes of transportation, in interstate or foreign commerce, any dog or other animal for participation in an animal fighting venture; and (3) using the mails or other instrumentality of interstate commerce to promote or further an animal fighting venture.

Amends the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit knowingly selling, buying, transporting, or delivering, in interstate or foreign commerce, a knife, a gaffe, or any other sharp instrument for attachment to the leg of a bird for use in an animal fighting venture.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gallegly, Elton [R-CA-24] · R–CA

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
303 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 110-22.

  2. Became Public Law No: 110-22.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Cleared for White House.

  9. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4317)

  10. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4317)

  11. Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 91.

  12. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  13. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 368 - 39 (Roll no. 188). (text: CR H3031)

    House roll call 188 · Individual votes
  14. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 368 - 39 (Roll no. 188).(text: CR H3031)

    House roll call 188 · Individual votes
  15. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3053-3054)

  16. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  17. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 137.

  18. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3031-3036)

  19. Mr. Scott (VA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  20. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 10.

  21. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  22. Committee on Agriculture discharged.

  23. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-27, Part I.

  24. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 110-27, Part I.

  25. Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

  26. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  27. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  28. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote .

  29. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  30. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  31. Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

  32. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E2)

  33. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  34. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  35. Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  36. Introduced in House

  37. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.137 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.137 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.137 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.137 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources