To provide that a portion of the income derived from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian shall not be considered as a resource or income in determining eligibility for assistance under any Federal or federally assisted program.

See H.R.2264.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 16, 1993

Amends Federal law to exclude a specified amount of income from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian from consideration as income for purposes of Federal assistance eligibility. Amends the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to increase the amount of cash exempted from consideration as income for purposes of Federal assistance eligibility.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Richardson, Bill [D-NM-3] · D–NM

Committees

Natural Resources Committee
Ways and Means Committee

6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

May 27, 1993
See H.R.2264.
May 3, 1993
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
May 3, 1993
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Apr 19, 1993
Executive Comment Requested from HHS.
Apr 13, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Native American Affairs.
Mar 18, 1993
Referred to the Subcommittee on Human Resources.
Mar 16, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Mar 16, 1993
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Mar 16, 1993
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E635-636)
Mar 16, 1993
Introduced in House
Mar 16, 1993
Introduced in House
Mar 11, 1993
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E596)

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in House · Mar 16, 1993 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 2264 · Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1367 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1367, 103rd Congress: To provide that a portion of the income derived from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian shall not be considered as a resource or income in determining eligibility for assistance under any Federal or federally assisted program.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1367

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-03-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1367/BILLS-103hr1367ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.R.1367 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1367 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1367, 103rd Congress: To provide that a portion of the income derived from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian shall not be considered as a resource or income in determining eligibility for assistance under any Federal or federally assisted program.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1367

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-03-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1367/BILLS-103hr1367ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1367 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1367 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1367, 103rd Congress: To provide that a portion of the income derived from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian shall not be considered as a resource or income in determining eligibility for assistance under any Federal or federally assisted program.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1367

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-03-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1367/BILLS-103hr1367ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1367 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1367 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.R.1367, 103rd Congress: To provide that a portion of the income derived from trust or restricted land held by an individual Indian shall not be considered as a resource or income in determining eligibility for assistance under any Federal or federally assisted program.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1367

Text version to examine: Introduced in House · 1993-03-16.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr1367/BILLS-103hr1367ih.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-01-02T17:23:47Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.R.1367 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.