To amend title 10, United States Code, to codify and make modifications to certain provisions relating to "Buy American" requirements.
Executive Comment Requested from DOD.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Apr 3, 2001
Codifies under Federal armed forces law certain provisions under prior defense appropriations Acts which prohibit funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense from being used to procure the following items if such items are not grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States: (1) food; (2) clothing; (3) tents, tarpaulins, or covers; (4) cotton and other natural fiber products, silk or silk blends, synthetic fabrics, canvas products, or wool; (5) any equipment manufactured from or containing such fibers, yarns, fabrics, or materials; (6) specialty metals, including stainless steel flatware; and (7) hand or measuring tools. Allows an exception: (1) when the item cannot be procured when needed (after certain congressional notification); (2) for certain procurements outside the United States; (3) for certain specialty metals and chemical warfare protective clothing procured outside the United States; (4) for foods manufactured or processed in the United States; and (5) for small purchases under the defense simplified acquisition threshold.Makes such prohibitions applicable to contracts for the procurement of commercial items under the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1352 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1352 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1352 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1352 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.