PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1348 / 103rd Congress

Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994

Became Public Law No: 103-449.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Sep 13, 1993

Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1993 - Establishes: (1) the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in Connecticut; and (2) within the Department of the Interior, the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission to assist appropriate Federal, State, and regional planning organizations and local authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated resource management plan for the Corridor's lands and water. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Gejdenson, Sam [D-CT-2] · D–CT

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-449.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-449.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (consideration: CR H11272)

  9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(consideration: CR H11272)

  10. Mr. Vento asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment.

  11. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 575 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of Senate amendment to H.R. 1348. The Senate amendment and the motion to concur shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour. The previous question shall be ordered without intervening motion.

  12. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  13. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  14. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  15. Amendment SP 2630 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

  16. Amendment SP 2630 proposed by Senator Ford for Senator Wallop.

  17. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S14409)

  18. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 511.

  19. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston under the authority of the order of Jun 27, 94 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-305. Minority views filed.

  20. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston under the authority of the order of Jun 27, 94 with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 103-305. Minority views filed.

  21. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

  22. Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks. Hearings held.

  23. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

  24. Referred to Subcommittee on Public Lands, National Parks.

  25. Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  26. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  27. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  28. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

  29. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  30. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6608-6610)

  31. Mr. Vento moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  32. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 127.

  33. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-233.

  34. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 103-233.

  35. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  36. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  37. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).

  38. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  39. Subcommittee Hearings Held.

  40. Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

  41. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  42. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E649-651)

  43. Introduced in House

  44. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1348 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1348 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1348 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1348 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources