Maritime Administration Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996
Ordered to be Reported (Amended).
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 29, 1995
Maritime Administration Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 - Authorizes appropriations for the Department of Transportation for FY 1996 for: (1) the operating-differential subsidy; (2) operating agreements for vessels enrolled in the Maritime Security Program; (3) operations and training activities; and (4) the costs of guaranteed loans authorized by the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as well as for administrative expenses related to loan guarantee commitments. Amends: (1) the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946 to require the Secretary of Transportation to consult with the Secretary of Defense (currently, Secretary of the Navy) regarding the National Defense Reserve Fleet and to repeal certain restrictions on requiring bids, payments, performance, or completion bonds from contractors with respect to repair or maintenance of Fleet vessels; and (2) the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 to extend war risk insurance authority. Requires the Secretary of Transportation to submit to the Congress a report on the condition of public ports of the United States each even-numbered (currently, each) year.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1347 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1347 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1347 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1347 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.