PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.131 / 119th Congress

Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act

The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2025

Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act

This bill reduces payments that communities within the Arkansas River Valley must pay to the Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit, a pipeline in Colorado for delivering water from the Pueblo Reservoir to such communities. Specifically, it removes interest payments and extends the repayment period to 100 years.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4] · R–CO

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. The Chair directed the Clerk to notify the Senate of the action of the House.

  2. On motion to refer the bill and the accompanying veto message to the Committee on Natural Resources. Agreed to without objection.

  3. Motion to refer the bill and accompanying veto message to the Committee on Natural Resources.

  4. On passage, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 248 - 177, 1 Present (Roll no. 9).

    House roll call 9 · Individual votes
  5. Failed of passage in House over veto On passage, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 248 - 177, 1 Present (Roll no. 9).

    House roll call 9 · Individual votes
  6. The Chair announced the unfinished business to be the consideration of the veto. (consideration: CR H212)

  7. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the veto message of the President to H.R. 131, the Chair put the question on will the House, on reconsideration, pass the bill, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. Under the Constitution, the vote must be taken by the yeas and nays. Further proceedings were postponed until a time to be announced.

  8. The previous question was ordered without objection.

  9. DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House of January 2, 2026, the unfinished business is the further consideration of the veto message of the President on H.R. 131. The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding. (consideration: CR H205-208)

  10. The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.

  11. POSTPONED CONSIDERATION OF VETO MESSAGE - The Chair announced that further consideration of the veto message and the bill, H.R. 131, is postponed until the legislative day of January 8, 2026. Agreed to without objection.

  12. The Chair announced that the objections of the President to H.R. 131 would be spread at large upon the Journal and the veto message would be printed as a House Document (119-119).

  13. The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.

  14. Vetoed by President.

  15. Vetoed by President.

  16. Presented to President.

  17. Presented to President.

  18. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  19. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S8766-8768)

  20. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

  21. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  22. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  23. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  24. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  25. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3497-3498)

  26. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3497-3498)

  27. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 131.

  28. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3497-3498)

  29. Mr. Gosar moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  30. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 152.

  31. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-187.

  32. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-187.

  33. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.

  34. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  35. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  36. Introduced in House

  37. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 26, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.131 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.131 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.131 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.131 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources