PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.130 / 119th Congress

Trust the Science Act

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2025

Trust the Science Act

This bill directs the Department of the Interior to remove protections for the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). Specifically, the bill requires Interior to reissue the final rule titled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and published on November 3, 2020.

The rule removed the gray wolf in the lower 48 United States, except for the Mexican wolf (C. l. baileyi) subspecies, from the endangered and threatened species list. However, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California vacated the rule on February 10, 2022. As a result, the gray wolf reattained the protection status it had prior to the rule's promulgation.

The bill also prohibits the reissuance of the rule from being subject to judicial review.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4] · R–CO

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    2. Introduced in House

    3. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Dec 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.130 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.130 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.130 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.130 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 30, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-01-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This bill would require the Interior Department to reissue a 2020 rule removing gray wolves from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife within 60 days after enactment. It would also prevent courts from reviewing that reissuance. The supplied bill does not reproduce the rule’s precise coverage or exceptions.

    Check the sources
    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule entitled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and published on November 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 69778).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03
    Reissuance of the final rule under section 2 shall not be subject to judicial review.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    How it would work

    Section 2 would require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue the specified rule published on November 3, 2020. The deadline would be 60 days after this section becomes law; the requirement would be mandatory.

    Check the source
    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule entitled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and published on November 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 69778).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    Section 3 would bar judicial review—review by a court—of the rule’s reissuance under section 2. The stated restriction concerns that reissuance.

    Check the source
    Reissuance of the final rule under section 2 shall not be subject to judicial review.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    What the record shows

    The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated December 6, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Natural Resources on January 3, 2025.

    Check the source
    Source snapshot updated 2025-12-06T06:46:47Z. 2025-01-03: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. 2025-01-03: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-12-06T06:46:47Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-01-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    Findings to examine

    The supplied introduced text contains a narrow exception to court review tied to its main policy. This classification is not a judgment about its justification.

    Section 3 would give the Interior Department’s required rule reissuance special protection from court review. This is a narrow procedural exception directly connected to the bill’s gray-wolf policy; the text does not name a private beneficiary.

    Check the sources
    Reissuance of the final rule under section 2 shall not be subject to judicial review.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03
    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule entitled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and published on November 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 69778).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The bundle contains the complete introduced bill, but not the referenced 2020 rule. Its geographic coverage, exceptions, and detailed legal consequences cannot be determined from the supplied evidence.
    • The supplied action snapshot does not establish passage or enactment. Its lack of later actions does not prove that the bill never advanced or became law.
    • No accompanying earmark disclosures, committee reports, or amendment history are supplied. The category assessments are limited to the introduced text.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Dec 6, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI