PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1283 / 106th Congress

Asbestos Compensation Act of 2000

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 449.

Official summary

Version 17 · Reported to House with amendment(s) · Jul 24, 2000

Asbestos Compensation Act of 2000- Title I: Establishment and Procedure - Establishes in the Department of Justice the Office of Asbestos Compensation (OAC), headed by an Administrator, with exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings to determine if a claimant is entitled to compensation for an asbestos claim, and the amount of such compensation. Establishes in the OAC: (1) the Asbestos Compensation Fund; and (2) the Office of Administrative Law Judges.(Sec. 101) Instructs the Administrator to appoint a Medical Advisory Committee to evaluate the medical review process and eligibility criteria. Prescribes guidelines for: (1) medical eligibility review; (2) election of administrative process; (3) settlement offers; (4) claimant's choice of forum; (5) administrative adjudication; (6) the appeals and judicial review process; and (7) OAC data gathering and maintenance in connection with product identification, settlements, judgments and awards.(Sec. 108) Instructs the OAC to implement a legal assistance program to represent claimants. Declares that claimants shall retain their right to be assisted by counsel of their free choice.(Sec. 109) Sets forth time limits upon decision making by either the Medical Director or the Trustee of the Asbestos Compensation Fund (Trustee).Title II: Law Applicable to Asbestos Adjudications - Conditions a claimant's recovery of compensation for damages caused by an eligible medical condition upon presentation of a medical eligibility certificate establishing its existence. Prescribes requirements and procedural guidelines for: (1) damages; (2) statute of limitations or repose; (3) come back rights; (4) class actions, aggregations of claims, and venue; and (5) core claims. Sets forth special rules applicable to adjudications and to the Trustee.Title III: Eligible Medical Categories - Identifies the following as eligible medical categories that are asbestos-related: (1) malignant conditions with impairment; (2) mesothelioma; (3) lung cancer; and (4) other cancer. Sets forth the standard criteria for such categories. (Sec. 306) Prescribes medical testing reimbursement guidelines.Title IV: Funding - Requires the Administrator to adopt rules for calculating and collecting from defendants all costs associated with claim determination and payments. Vests the Trustee with subsequent enforcement authority.(Sec. 402) Prescribes guidelines governing fiscal and financial management of the Asbestos Compensation Fund.(Sec. 403) Authorizes appropriations for the OAC and the United States Court of Federal Claims. Authorizes offsetting collections of administrative assessments.Title V: Transition - Prescribes applicability guidelines and transitional civil action procedures.Title VI: Definitions - Sets forth definitions germane to this Act.Title VII: Miscellaneous Provisions - Prescribes implementation requirements and guidelines with respect to: (1) relationship to other laws; (2) annual status report by the Administrator to the President and Congress; (3) enforcement; (4) defendant parties to a Qualifying National Settlement Plan; and (5) settlements.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6] · R–IL

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
77 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 449.

  2. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-782.

  3. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 106-782.

  4. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.

  5. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  6. Committee Hearings Held.

  7. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  8. Introduced in House

  9. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1283 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1283 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1283 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1283 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources