PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1250 / 119th Congress

To require the imposition of sanctions with respect to Ansarallah and its officials, agents, or affiliates for acts of international terrorism.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 12, 2025

This bill requires the President to designate Ansarallah, the Iran-backed movement in Yemen also known as the Houthis, as a foreign terrorist organization. The President must also report to Congress a determination as to whether specified foreign persons are officials, agents, or affiliates of Ansarallah.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham [R-AZ-8] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
4 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Feb 4, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1250 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1250 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1250 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1250 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 30, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-12 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The bill would require the President to formally designate Ansarallah, also called the Houthi movement, as a foreign terrorist organization under federal immigration law. It would also require the President to tell two congressional committees whether three named foreign individuals are officials, agents, or affiliates of the movement. These are proposed requirements.

Check the sources
the President shall designate Ansarallah as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12
the President shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a determination regarding whether the following foreign persons are officials, agents, or affiliates of Ansarallah: (1) Abdul Malik al-Houthi. (2) Abd al-Khaliq Badr al-Din al-Houthi. (3) Abdullah Yahya al-Hakim.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

How it would work

The President would have to make the foreign terrorist organization designation within 30 days after enactment, using the authority specified in section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Check the source
Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall designate Ansarallah as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

Within 30 days after making that designation, the President would have to submit a determination to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Foreign Affairs Committee about whether Abdul Malik al-Houthi, Abd al-Khaliq Badr al-Din al-Houthi, and Abdullah Yahya al-Hakim are officials, agents, or affiliates of Ansarallah. The provision requires an assessment; it does not itself decide their status.

Check the source
Not later than 30 days after the President makes the designation required by subsection (a), the President shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a determination regarding whether the following foreign persons are officials, agents, or affiliates of Ansarallah: (1) Abdul Malik al-Houthi. (2) Abd al-Khaliq Badr al-Din al-Houthi. (3) Abdullah Yahya al-Hakim.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

The proposed requirements would cover the movement under the names Ansarallah, the Houthi movement, or any other alias.

Check the source
In this section, the term Ansarallah means the movement known as Ansarallah, the Houthi movement, or any other alias.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated February 4, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Judiciary Committee on February 12, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-02-04T04:26:29Z. 2025-02-12: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 2025-02-12: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-02-04T04:26:29Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-12. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and accompanying committee materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No narrow preferential benefit, special exemption, or carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied text is the introduced version. The dated actions snapshot does not establish whether the bill later advanced, changed, or became law; missing actions do not prove that none occurred.
  • The bill references section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act without reproducing it. The supplied evidence therefore does not establish the designation's detailed legal consequences, procedures, exceptions, or termination rules.
  • The evidence does not establish Ansarallah's designation status independently of this proposal or provide the President's determinations about the three named individuals.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Feb 4, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI