Byron Nash Renal Medullary Carcinoma Awareness Act of 2023
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2025
Byron Nash Renal Medullary Carcinoma Awareness Act of 2023 [sic]
This bill allows states to receive federal payment under Medicaid for 50% of their costs for providing education on the risk of renal medullary carcinoma to individuals with sickle cell disease. (Renal medullary carcinoma is a rare kidney disease usually found in individuals with the sickle cell trait.)
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Mar 19, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.124 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.124 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.124 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.124 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 30, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-01-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The bill proposes adding renal medullary carcinoma to an existing Medicaid provision concerning education about health risks for people with sickle cell disease. The section describes this as providing incentives for education. Because the existing law is not reproduced, the supplied text does not establish the precise incentive or how it would operate.
Check the sources
2. Providing incentives for education on risk of renal medullary carcinoma to individuals with Sickle Cell Disease under Medicaid
Section 1903(a)(3)(E)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(3)(E)(ii)) is amended by inserting , renal medullary carcinoma, after stroke each place it appears.
Section 2 would insert “renal medullary carcinoma” after each occurrence of “stroke” in the specified Social Security Act provision. The amendment does not reproduce or otherwise explain the surrounding statutory requirements.
Check the source
Section 1903(a)(3)(E)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(3)(E)(ii)) is amended by inserting , renal medullary carcinoma, after stroke each place it appears.
The supplied March 19, 2025 source snapshot records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on January 3, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2025-03-19T16:00:15Z.
2025-01-03: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
2025-01-03: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-01-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment beyond the policy's intended coverage was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version.
What this analysis cannot establish
The bundle supplies the complete introduced bill but not the existing statutory provision it would amend. The incentive's amount, eligibility rules, covered services, exceptions, and administration cannot be determined from the supplied amendment alone.
The actions snapshot supplies no subsequent legislative history or evidence of enactment. This does not establish that the bill never advanced or became law.
No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied; the spending review is limited to the introduced text.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Mar 19, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI