PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.121 / 119th Congress

No Vaccine Passports Act

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2025

No Vaccine Passports Act

This bill prohibits certain actions related to vaccine passports and proof of COVID-19 vaccination.

Specifically, a federal agency may not issue a vaccine passport, vaccine pass, or other standardized documentation for the purpose of certifying the COVID-19 vaccination status of a U.S. citizen to a third party, or otherwise publish or share any COVID-19 vaccination record of a U.S. citizen or similar health information.

Additionally, proof of COVID-19 vaccination shall not be required to access federal or congressional property or services.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Committee on House Administration
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    2. Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Feb 25, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.121 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.121 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.121 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.121 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-01-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    The proposed No Vaccine Passports Act would bar covered agencies from issuing standardized documents certifying U.S. citizens’ COVID-19 vaccination status to others, and from publishing or sharing their vaccination records or similar health information. It would also prevent proof of COVID-19 vaccination from being required to enter federal property or congressional grounds or to use federal or congressional services.

    Check the sources
    This Act may be cited as the No Vaccine Passports Act.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03
    An agency may not issue a vaccine passport, vaccine pass, or other standardized documentation for the purpose of certifying the COVID–19 vaccination status of a citizen of the United States to a third party, or otherwise publish or share any COVID–19 vaccination record of a citizen of the United States, or similar health information.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03
    Proof of COVID–19 vaccination shall not be deemed a requirement for access to Federal property or Federal services, or for access to congressional grounds or services.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    How it would work

    Section 2 would prohibit covered agencies from issuing vaccine passports, passes, or other standardized documents intended to certify a U.S. citizen’s COVID-19 vaccination status to someone else.

    Check the source
    An agency may not issue a vaccine passport, vaccine pass, or other standardized documentation for the purpose of certifying the COVID–19 vaccination status of a citizen of the United States to a third party
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    The proposed restriction would also prohibit covered agencies from otherwise publishing or sharing a U.S. citizen’s COVID-19 vaccination record or similar health information. Its reach therefore extends beyond issuing vaccine passports.

    Check the source
    or otherwise publish or share any COVID–19 vaccination record of a citizen of the United States, or similar health information.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    Section 2 would use the existing definition of “agency” in section 551 of title 5 of the United States Code to determine which bodies are covered.

    Check the source
    In this section, the term agency has the meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    Section 3 would prohibit requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination for access to federal property, federal services, congressional grounds, or congressional services. This provision does not state a citizenship restriction.

    Check the source
    Proof of COVID–19 vaccination shall not be deemed a requirement for access to Federal property or Federal services, or for access to congressional grounds or services.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    What the record shows

    The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated February 25, 2025, records introduction in the House on January 3, 2025, and referral that day to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on House Administration for provisions within their respective jurisdictions.

    Check the sources
    Source snapshot updated 2025-02-25T14:20:22Z.
    Official legislative record · 2025-02-25T14:20:22Z
    2025-01-03: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-02-25T14:20:22Z
    2025-01-03: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
    Official legislative record · 2025-02-25T14:20:22Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-01-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or appropriations rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not cover other versions or accompanying disclosure and committee materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not cover other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The supplied full text is the introduced version. The dated actions snapshot does not establish later legislative developments or enactment; its lack of later actions does not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
    • The bundle does not reproduce the referenced statutory definition of “agency,” so it does not establish the full list of covered bodies or exclusions.
    • The supplied text does not define “similar health information” or specify exceptions, a separate enforcement mechanism, an implementation date, or an expiration condition.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Feb 25, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI