PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1209 / 119th Congress

End of GSE Conservatorship Preparation Act of 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 11, 2025

End of GSE Conservatorship Preparation Act of 2025

This bill requires the Department of the Treasury to report to Congress on the status of proposals to establish a timeline and process (1) to end the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and (2) for Treasury to resolve its investment in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (As a result of the financial crisis, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac entered into a conservatorship in 2008 with the Federal Housing Finance Agency. As part of this agreement, Treasury provided funds to support the solvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.)   

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5] · R–TN

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

    2. Introduced in House

    3. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 26, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1209 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1209 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1209 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1209 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-11 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This bill would require Treasury to report to Congress on two proposals concerning the end of conservatorships—government supervision—of the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Treasury would have to provide completed proposals and finish any that remain incomplete. The bill would impose planning and reporting requirements; it would not itself end either conservatorship.

    Check the sources
    2. Proposals for termination of conservatorships
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11
    (1) the Department of the Treasury completed the proposal described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association, dated January 14, 2021, and the proposal described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, dated January 14, 2021; and (2) either or both of such proposals were completed and, if so, includes such completed proposal or proposals.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11
    (b) Proposals If the report required under subsection (a) indicates that either or both of such proposals were not completed, the Secretary of the Treasury shall— (1) include in such report the latest incomplete draft or version, if any, of such incomplete proposal or proposals; and (2) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, complete and submit such proposal or proposals to the committees identified in subsection (a).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11

    How it would work

    Within 30 days after enactment, the Treasury Secretary would have to submit a report to the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.

    Check the source
    (a) Report Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11

    The report would have to state whether Treasury completed the proposals described in article IX of the two January 14, 2021 letter agreements concerning preferred stock purchases. It would have to include whichever proposals were completed. The bill identifies the required proposals by reference to those agreements rather than reproducing their requirements.

    Check the source
    that identifies whether— (1) the Department of the Treasury completed the proposal described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal National Mortgage Association, dated January 14, 2021, and the proposal described in article IX of the Letter Agreement to the Amended and Restated Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, dated January 14, 2021; and (2) either or both of such proposals were completed and, if so, includes such completed proposal or proposals.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11

    If either proposal remained incomplete, Treasury would have to include its latest draft or version in the report, if one existed. The bill would not require an existing draft where none was available.

    Check the source
    (b) Proposals If the report required under subsection (a) indicates that either or both of such proposals were not completed, the Secretary of the Treasury shall— (1) include in such report the latest incomplete draft or version, if any, of such incomplete proposal or proposals;
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11

    If the report identified an incomplete proposal, Treasury would have to complete it and submit it to the same committees within 90 days after enactment. That deadline would run from enactment, not from submission of the initial report.

    Check the sources
    (b) Proposals If the report required under subsection (a) indicates that either or both of such proposals were not completed, the Secretary of the Treasury shall—
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11
    (2) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, complete and submit such proposal or proposals to the committees identified in subsection (a).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-11

    What the record shows

    The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated August 26, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Financial Services on February 11, 2025.

    Check the source
    Source snapshot updated 2026-08-26T16:27:38Z. 2025-02-11: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. 2025-02-11: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2026-08-26T16:27:38Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-11. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or appropriations policy rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish the contents of other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and committee or conference materials were not supplied.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The January 14, 2021 letter agreements and their article IX provisions are not supplied. The evidence therefore does not establish the required contents of the referenced proposals or the conditions for ending the conservatorships.
    • The bundle does not establish whether Treasury completed either proposal or whether any drafts exist.
    • This analysis describes the supplied introduced text as a proposal. The dated actions snapshot does not establish subsequent legislative progress or enactment; its lack of further entries does not prove that neither occurred.
    • The supplied text specifies reporting and completion deadlines but contains no separate enforcement mechanism, sunset date, or operative conditions for terminating the conservatorships.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Aug 26, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI