Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: May 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.1205 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.1205 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.1205 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.1205 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 30, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-11 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposed Safe Shelters Act of 2025 would restrict access to government-run disaster shelters for people covered by its sex-offender registration definition. They could enter shelters not designated for them only to seek information about designated shelters, and would have to identify their registration status immediately. The Federal Emergency Management Agency could designate separate shelters for their use. Knowing violations could bring fines, up to five years in prison, or both.
Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Safe Shelters Act of 2025.
Except for the purpose of seeking information on designated shelters, a covered sex offender may not enter or use the services of an undesignated shelter.
A covered sex offender who enters an undesignated shelter shall, immediately upon entering such shelter, notify any individual operating such shelter that such offender is required to register on the National Sex Offender Registry.
Whoever, in or affecting interstate commerce, being a covered sex offender, knowingly fails to comply with paragraph (1) or (2) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may, as necessary, designate a Federal building or Federal prison from the lists created pursuant to paragraph (2) as a designated shelter
The term emergency shelter means a shelter run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or a State or local government in response to a disaster described in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
The proposal would cover sex offenders required to register on the National Sex Offender Registry under the cited federal registration law. It adopts existing federal definitions of sex offender and the registry rather than reproducing them.
Check the sources
The term covered sex offender means a sex offender who is required to register on the National Sex Offender Registry under section 113 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (34 U.S.C. 20913).
The term National Sex Offender Registry means the national database established under section 119 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (34 U.S.C. 20921).
The shelter rules would apply to disaster shelters run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or state or local governments. A designated shelter would be reserved for covered sex offenders only; other emergency shelters within this definition would be undesignated shelters.
Check the sources
The term emergency shelter means a shelter run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or a State or local government in response to a disaster described in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
A covered person could enter or use an undesignated shelter only to seek information about designated shelters. Upon entering, the person would have to notify a shelter operator immediately of the registration requirement. The notified operator would have to explain the restriction and provide information about any designated shelter.
Check the source
(1) In general Except for the purpose of seeking information on designated shelters, a covered sex offender may not enter or use the services of an undesignated shelter. (2) Notification A covered sex offender who enters an undesignated shelter shall, immediately upon entering such shelter, notify any individual operating such shelter that such offender is required to register on the National Sex Offender Registry. (3) Provision of information Upon receiving a notification from a covered sex offender under paragraph (2), the individual so notified shall inform such offender of— (A) any designated shelter; and (B) the prohibition in paragraph (1).
A covered person who knowingly violated the entry or service restriction, or the notification requirement, could face a federal fine, imprisonment for up to five years, or both. The penalty would apply when the violation occurs in or affects interstate commerce—commerce between states.
Check the source
Whoever, in or affecting interstate commerce, being a covered sex offender, knowingly fails to comply with paragraph (1) or (2) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
The access restrictions, notification and operator-information duties, and criminal penalty in subsection (a) would take effect 180 days after enactment.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency administrator could, as necessary, designate available federal buildings or federal prisons from the required lists as shelters. This authority would be discretionary. A designation would last for the duration of a qualifying disaster, as determined by the administrator.
Check the source
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may, as necessary, designate a Federal building or Federal prison from the lists created pursuant to paragraph (2) as a designated shelter for the duration, as determined by the Administrator, of a disaster described in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
Within 180 days after enactment, and on an ongoing basis afterward, the General Services Administration administrator and Bureau of Prisons director would each have to supply the Federal Emergency Management Agency with lists of available federal buildings or federal prisons, respectively, for possible designation.
Check the source
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act and on an ongoing basis thereafter, the Administrator of the General Services Administration and Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall each make available to the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency a list of available Federal buildings or Federal prisons, as appropriate, that the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may designate pursuant to paragraph (1).
The Federal Emergency Management Agency administrator would have to make information about every designated shelter available to each operator of an undesignated shelter.
Check the source
The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall make available to each individual operating an undesignated shelter information on each designated shelter.
The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated May 2, 2025, records introduction in the House on February 11, 2025, and referrals that day to the Transportation and Infrastructure and Judiciary committees and the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
2025-02-11: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-11. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for a particular recipient or place was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying materials needed to assess formal earmark status are not supplied.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No narrow preferential carve-out or special benefit meeting the review definition was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. Coverage of the population directly addressed by the shelter policy is not itself preferential treatment. This conclusion is limited to that version.
What this analysis cannot establish
The bundle supplies the complete introduced text and an official-actions snapshot updated May 2, 2025. It does not establish subsequent amendments, passage, or enactment. The provisions are described as proposals; missing later history does not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
The referenced federal definitions, registration requirements, disaster provisions, and fine rules are not reproduced. Their full scope and application cannot be determined from this bundle alone.
The text does not establish how many designated shelters would be available, their capacity, transportation arrangements, or what would happen if no designated shelter were available. It provides no evidence of actual safety or other outcomes.
No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or amendment attachment history are supplied. Those omissions limit conclusions about formal earmark status and legislative attachments.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: May 2, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI