PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Congressional Research Service
No official summary is available in the imported record yet.
People & committees
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1] · R–SC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: May 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1203 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1203 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1203 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1203 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
PlainBill explanation
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-11 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
The bill proposes to change when the federal video-voyeurism law applies. For people whose conduct meets the existing offense requirements, it would replace the current location condition with any one of seven listed circumstances. These include connections to commerce across state or national borders, such as using an object that previously traveled in that commerce, and conduct in any U.S. territory or possession. The bill would also raise the maximum prison term from one year to five years. The existing offense requirements are not reproduced in the supplied sources.
(A) by striking , in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and inserting , in a circumstance described in subsection (d),; and (B) by striking imprisoned not more than one year and inserting imprisoned not more than 5 years;
(5) any equipment, item, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a);
(6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce.
Section 1 would give the bill the short title “Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025.”
This Act may be cited as the Stop Victimizers and Offenders from Yielding Explicit Unconsented Recordings Surreptitiously Act of 2025 or as the Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025.
Section 2 would amend 18 U.S.C. § 1801(a), replacing the phrase referring to the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States with a reference to circumstances in a new subsection (d). It would raise the maximum prison term from one year to five years; the amendment does not specify a mandatory minimum prison term.
Section 1801 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking , in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and inserting , in a circumstance described in subsection (d),; and (B) by striking imprisoned not more than one year and inserting imprisoned not more than 5 years;
One circumstance would cover travel by either the offender or the victim in interstate or foreign commerce, or using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of that commerce, to further or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a). Another would cover the offender's use of such a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality to further or in connection with that conduct.
(1) the offender or victim traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or traveled using a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a);
(2) the offender used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a);
A direct or indirect payment of any kind made to further or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) could supply another basis for coverage if it used a means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce, or was in or affected that commerce.
(3) any payment of any kind was made, directly or indirectly, in furtherance of or in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce;
Another circumstance would cover an offender's transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of a communication related to or furthering the conduct described in subsection (a). The provision expressly includes computer, mail, wire, and electromagnetic transmissions.
(4) the offender transmitted in interstate or foreign commerce any communication relating to or in furtherance of the conduct described in subsection (a) using any means, channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means or in manner, including by computer, mail, wire, or electromagnetic transmission;
Using equipment, an item, or another object that had traveled in interstate or foreign commerce to perform the conduct described in subsection (a) would be a separate basis for coverage.
(5) any equipment, item, or other object that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce was used to perform the conduct described in subsection (a);
The remaining circumstances would cover conduct within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or any U.S. territory or possession, and conduct that otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce.
(6) the conduct described in subsection (a) occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or any territory or possession of the United States; or (7) the conduct described in subsection (a) otherwise occurred in or affected interstate or foreign commerce.
The official-actions snapshot updated May 2, 2025, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Judiciary Committee on February 11, 2025.
Source snapshot updated 2025-05-02T14:52:58Z. 2025-02-11: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 2025-02-11: Introduced in House
A closer look
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-11. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials; formal earmark disclosures and related materials were not supplied.
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, preferential treatment, or exception warranting a finding was identified after reviewing the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: May 2, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI