PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 3, 1993
Amends the Federal Election Compaign Act of 1971 to: (1) limit nonparty multicandidate political committee (PAC) and out-of-State contributions to House of Representatives candidates; and (2) reduce the reporting threshold for certain contributions and expenditures. Amends the Internal Revenue Code to provide an income tax credit for contributions to nonincumbent House of Representatives candidates. Entitles nonincumbent House of Representatives candidates to reduced third class mail rates for campaign materials.
People & committees
Rep. Kopetski, Mike [D-OR-5] · D–OR
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Postal Operations and Services.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E501-502)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1185 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1185 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1185 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1185 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.