PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1176 / 119th Congress

Clock Hour Program Student Protection Act

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 2025

Clock Hour Program Student Protection Act

This bill provides statutory authority for the 150% rule, which allows an educational program that prepares students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation to maintain eligibility for federal student aid funding if the program operates within 150% of the state's minimum hours requirement for licensure. 

The Department of Education (ED) previously enforced the 150% rule through regulations. ED proposed a new regulation to rescind the 150% rule and instead limit the length of these programs to 100% of the state's minimum required hours. This revised regulation was set to take effect on July 1, 2024; however, a court imposed a temporary injunction to halt the regulation from taking effect.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Smucker, Lloyd [R-PA-11] · R–PA

Committees

  • Education and Workforce Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jan 23, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1176 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1176 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1176 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1176 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-10 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposal would require certain job-training programs to qualify as eligible programs under the Higher Education Act even when they provide more instructional hours than the state requires. Programs would still need to satisfy other eligibility requirements. Their instructional hours could not exceed the higher of 150% of the state minimum or 150% of the federal agency minimum for that training.

Check the source
An otherwise eligible program that provides a program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized profession in a State, and for which the number of clock hours of instruction exceeds the minimum number of clock hours of instruction required by such State for training in the recognized profession for which the otherwise eligible program prepares students, shall be determined to be an eligible program under this subsection if the number of clock hours of instruction provided by such otherwise eligible program does not exceed the greater of— (A) 150 percent of the minimum number of clock hours required by such State for training in the recognized profession for which the otherwise eligible program prepares students; or (B) 150 percent of the minimum number of clock hours required by a Federal agency for such training.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

How it would work

Section 2 would add an eligibility rule to section 481(b) of the Higher Education Act. It would cover otherwise eligible programs preparing students for paid work in a recognized profession whose instructional hours exceed the state's required minimum.

Check the sources
Section 481(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
An otherwise eligible program that provides a program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized profession in a State, and for which the number of clock hours of instruction exceeds the minimum number of clock hours of instruction required by such State for training in the recognized profession for which the otherwise eligible program prepares students
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

For covered programs, eligibility would be mandatory if instructional hours stay within the specified limit, including exactly at that limit. The limit would be one and a half times the state minimum or one and a half times the federal agency minimum, whichever is higher.

Check the source
shall be determined to be an eligible program under this subsection if the number of clock hours of instruction provided by such otherwise eligible program does not exceed the greater of— (A) 150 percent of the minimum number of clock hours required by such State for training in the recognized profession for which the otherwise eligible program prepares students; or (B) 150 percent of the minimum number of clock hours required by a Federal agency for such training.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

The amendment would take effect upon enactment and apply to award year 2024–2025 and every succeeding award year. The provision specifies no final award year.

Check the source
The amendment made by this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to award year 2024–2025, and each succeeding award year.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated January 23, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Education and Workforce on February 10, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-01-23T18:27:10Z. 2025-02-10: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. 2025-02-10: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-01-23T18:27:10Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-10. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; earmark disclosures and accompanying committee materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No narrow preferential exception beyond the main policy's intended program coverage was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The bundle supplies the complete introduced text, but not the existing section 481(b) or related regulations. It does not establish the other eligibility requirements, the current instructional-hour restrictions, or the precise consequences for student financial assistance.
  • The actions snapshot supplies no passage or enactment record. That omission does not establish that the bill never advanced or became law; the provisions here are described as proposals in the supplied introduced version.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jan 23, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI