PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1167 / 106th Congress

Tribal Self-Governance Amendments of 2000

Became Public Law No: 106-260.

Official summary

Version 36 · Passed House amended · Nov 17, 1999

Tribal Self-Governance Amendments of 1999 - Amends the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish the Tribal Self-Governance Program within the Indian Health Service of HHS to provide for further self-governance by Indian tribes. Sets forth program requirements and related provisions. Authorizes appropriations.Requires the Secretary to: (1) conduct a study to determine the feasibility of a Tribal Self-Governance Demonstration Project for appropriate programs, services, functions, and activities of HHS, other than the Indian Health Service; (2) consult with Indian tribes to determine a study protocol for consultation prior to consultation with other specified entities; and (3) publish the proposed protocol and allow a comment period for interested individuals. Authorizes appropriations.Directs the Secretary, at the request of an Indian tribe, to enter into an agreement for the acquisition of any goods, services, or supplies available to the Secretary from other Federal agencies that are not directly available to the tribe under this Act or any other Federal law, including acquisitions from prime vendors.Deems Indian patient records, at the option of an Indian tribe or tribal organization, to be Federal records for the limited purposes of making such records eligible for storage by Federal Records Centers to the same extent and in the same manner as other HHS patient records.Repeals current provisions of the Act that provide for a Tribal Self-Governance Project and makes funds for such Project available for use under this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Miller, George [D-CA-7] · D–CA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
29 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 106-260.

  2. Became Public Law No: 106-260.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to House Amendments to the Senate amendment to the bill by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7715; text as Senate agreed to House amendment to the Senate amendment: CR S7715)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House Amendments to the Senate amendment to the bill by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S7715; text as Senate agreed to House amendment to the Senate amendment: CR S7715)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendments to Senate amendment.

  11. House agreed to Senate amendment with amendments pursuant to H. Res. 562.

  12. Resolving differences -- House actions: House agreed to Senate amendment with amendments pursuant to H. Res. 562.

  13. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  14. Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a conference.

  15. Passed Senate in lieu of S.979 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  16. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate in lieu of S.979 with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

  17. Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S.979 amended.

  18. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2138)

  19. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 419.

  20. Received in the Senate.

  21. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  22. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H12133-12141)

  23. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H12133-12141)

  24. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1167.

  25. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H12133-12141)

  26. Mr. Hansen moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  27. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 271.

  28. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-477.

  29. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 106-477.

  30. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Voice Vote.

  31. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  32. Executive Comment Requested from Interior.

  33. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  34. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E456)

  35. Introduced in House

  36. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1167 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1167 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1167 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1167 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources