PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1161 / 119th Congress

Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 2025

Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025

This bill authorizes the President to enter into negotiations with the government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland. The bill also renames Greenland as Red, White, and Blueland.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1] · R–GA

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    2. Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Oct 9, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1161 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1161 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1161 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1161 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-10 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This proposal would authorize the President to negotiate with Denmark to buy or otherwise acquire Greenland. It would also rename Greenland “Red, White, and Blueland” in U.S. legal references and records, requiring federal agencies to update their documents and maps within 180 days of enactment. Authorizing negotiations would not itself complete an acquisition.

    Check the sources
    The President is authorized to enter into negotiations with the Government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
    (a) Renaming Greenland shall be known as Red, White, and Blueland. (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to Greenland shall be deemed to be a reference to Red, White, and Blueland.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the head of each Federal agency shall update each document and map of the Federal agency in accordance with the renaming described in subsection (a).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

    How it would work

    Section 2 would permit, but would not require, the President to negotiate with Denmark's government to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland.

    Check the source
    The President is authorized to enter into negotiations with the Government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

    Section 3 would rename Greenland “Red, White, and Blueland” and treat existing references to Greenland in U.S. laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, and other records as references to that new name.

    Check the source
    (a) Renaming Greenland shall be known as Red, White, and Blueland. (b) References Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to Greenland shall be deemed to be a reference to Red, White, and Blueland.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Chairman of the Board on Geographic Names, would oversee the renaming in every federal document and map.

    Check the source
    The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Chairman of the Board on Geographic Names, shall oversee the implementation of the renaming described in subsection (a) with respect to each Federal document and map.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

    Each federal agency head would have to update every agency document and map to reflect the new name within 180 days after Section 3 became law.

    Check the source
    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the head of each Federal agency shall update each document and map of the Federal agency in accordance with the renaming described in subsection (a).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

    What the record shows

    The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated October 9, 2025, records introduction in the House on February 10, 2025, and referral that day to the Foreign Affairs and Natural Resources committees for provisions within their respective jurisdictions.

    Check the sources
    Source snapshot updated 2025-10-09T00:11:25Z.
    Official legislative record · 2025-10-09T00:11:25Z
    2025-02-10: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-10-09T00:11:25Z
    2025-02-10: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
    Official legislative record · 2025-10-09T00:11:25Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-10. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or policy attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The supplied full text is the introduced House version dated February 10, 2025. Its provisions are proposals, not evidence of enacted law. The October 9, 2025 actions snapshot does not establish subsequent progress or enactment; missing actions do not prove that neither occurred.
    • The text supplies no acquisition price, negotiated terms, funding, or process for completing an acquisition. It does not expressly make renaming conditional on acquiring Greenland.
    • The text specifies an agency update deadline but no exceptions, enforcement penalties, or termination conditions. It provides no estimate of implementation costs.
    • No member earmark requests, disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied, limiting assessment beyond the introduced bill text.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Oct 9, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI