PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1160 / 119th Congress

Health Care Provider Shortage Minimization Act of 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 10, 2025

Health Care Provider Shortage Minimization Act of 2025

This bill provides statutory authority to classify qualified locum tenens physicians and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for federal tax purposes. (Locum tenens generally refers to an individual who temporarily fulfills the duties of another individual and is commonly used to refer to temporary staffing in the healthcare industry.)

Under current law, independent contractors are considered self-employed for federal tax purposes and, thus, are required to make quarterly estimated income tax payments and pay self-employment taxes (Social Security and Medicare taxes). (Other federal tax reporting requirements and obligations apply.)

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

The bill defines a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner as an individual who provides temporary services for not more than one continuous year at a site of service as (1) a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, dentistry, optometry, or podiatry (authorized to provide such services by the state, U.S. possession, or U.S. territory in which such services are performed); or (2) a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist. The term also includes an individual who provides such temporary services and is otherwise considered a physician under the Social Security Act (e.g., certain chiropractors).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1] · R–GA

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1160 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1160 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1160 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1160 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-10 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed Health Care Provider Shortage Minimization Act of 2025 would give qualifying temporary doctors and advanced care practitioners special treatment under the federal tax code: they would not count as employees for covered services. Those receiving their services, contracting agencies, and payors would not count as employers. Eligibility would require a placement lasting no more than one continuous year at a service site and a written contract specifying nonemployee treatment.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Health Care Provider Shortage Minimization Act of 2025.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
For the purposes of the taxes and other obligations imposed by this title, in the case of services performed as a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner— (1) the individual performing such services shall not be treated as an employee, (2) neither the persons for whom such services are performed, nor any agency that contracts with a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner, shall be treated as an employer, (3) any payor shall not be treated as an employer
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
such individual provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services as a locum tenens physician or locum tenens advanced care practitioner for a period of not more than one continuous year at a site of service
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
the services described in subparagraph (A) performed by the individual are performed pursuant to a written contract and such contract provides that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services for purposes of this subtitle.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

How it would work

Section 2 would add section 3513 to the Internal Revenue Code. For qualifying services, the individual would not be treated as an employee, and the service recipient, contracting agency, and payor would not be treated as employers. Compensation would not be treated as payment for employment. The provision addresses taxes and other obligations under that Code.

Check the sources
Chapter 25 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 3513. Treatment of locum tenens physicians and advanced care practitioners
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
For the purposes of the taxes and other obligations imposed by this title, in the case of services performed as a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner— (1) the individual performing such services shall not be treated as an employee, (2) neither the persons for whom such services are performed, nor any agency that contracts with a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner, shall be treated as an employer, (3) any payor shall not be treated as an employer, and (4) the remuneration paid or received for such service shall not be treated as paid or received with respect to employment.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

The proposed treatment would apply only to qualifying temporary services, described as “locum tenens” work. An individual could provide those services for no more than one continuous year at a service site to qualify.

Check the source
such individual provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services as a locum tenens physician or locum tenens advanced care practitioner for a period of not more than one continuous year at a site of service
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

Eligible professionals would include doctors of medicine, osteopathy, dental surgery, or dental medicine legally authorized to practice where they provide services, and doctors of podiatric medicine or optometry legally authorized to perform those functions there. The bill also includes physicians covered by either of two referenced federal definitions, whose text is not supplied.

Check the source
(i) a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, dental surgery, or dental medicine legally authorized to practice medicine, surgery or dentistry in the State, territory, or possession in which the individual performs such services, (ii) a doctor of podiatric medicine or doctor of optometry legally authorized to perform podiatric or optometry functions in the State, territory, or possession in which the individual performs such services, (iii) a physician, as defined in section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act Section (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)) or section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

Nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, and certified registered nurse anesthetists would also be eligible, subject to the same temporary-service and contract requirements. These are the professions the bill calls “advanced care practitioners.”

Check the sources
(iv) an advanced care practitioner
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
The term advanced care practitioner means a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
such individual provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services as a locum tenens physician or locum tenens advanced care practitioner for a period of not more than one continuous year at a site of service
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
the services described in subparagraph (A) performed by the individual are performed pursuant to a written contract and such contract provides that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services for purposes of this subtitle.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

Qualifying services would have to be performed under a written contract stating that the individual will not be treated as an employee for those services for purposes of the specified tax-code subtitle.

Check the source
the services described in subparagraph (A) performed by the individual are performed pursuant to a written contract and such contract provides that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services for purposes of this subtitle.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated September 19, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 10, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-19T23:19:05Z. 2025-02-10: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. 2025-02-10: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-09-19T23:19:05Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-10. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish what appears in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; member disclosures and committee or conference materials are not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The proposal contains a profession-specific tax classification carve-out central to its main policy. This classification does not establish the size of any financial benefit or imply improper treatment.

The bill would give qualifying temporary physicians and advanced care practitioners, along with service recipients, contracting agencies, and payors, special nonemployee or nonemployer treatment under the tax code. This narrow treatment is limited by a one-continuous-year service-site rule and a written nonemployee contract requirement.

Check the sources
For the purposes of the taxes and other obligations imposed by this title, in the case of services performed as a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner— (1) the individual performing such services shall not be treated as an employee, (2) neither the persons for whom such services are performed, nor any agency that contracts with a qualified locum tenens physician or advanced care practitioner, shall be treated as an employer, (3) any payor shall not be treated as an employer, and (4) the remuneration paid or received for such service shall not be treated as paid or received with respect to employment.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
such individual provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services as a locum tenens physician or locum tenens advanced care practitioner for a period of not more than one continuous year at a site of service
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10
the services described in subparagraph (A) performed by the individual are performed pursuant to a written contract and such contract provides that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services for purposes of this subtitle.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-10

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied full text is the introduced version dated February 10, 2025. The actions snapshot does not establish subsequent advancement or enactment; missing later actions do not prove that neither occurred.
  • The existing tax-code provisions and the two referenced federal definitions of physician are not reproduced. The bundle therefore does not establish the full range of eligible physicians or the resulting tax liabilities for each affected party. Nonemployee treatment does not itself establish exemption from all taxes.
  • The text does not explain how interruptions or repeat placements would affect the one-continuous-year limit. It supplies no program expiration date or separate enforcement process.
  • No fiscal analysis or evidence of effects on health care staffing is supplied. The bill’s title does not establish that the proposal would reduce shortages.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 19, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI