PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1158 / 113th Congress

North Cascades National Park Service Complex Fish Stocking Act

Became Public Law No: 113-137.

Official summary

Version 82 · Passed Senate without amendment · Jul 9, 2014

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House reported version is repeated here.)

North Cascades National Park Service Complex Fish Stocking Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to authorize the stocking of fish in lakes in the North Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake Chelan National Recreation Area (the North Cascades National Park Service Complex).

Authorizes the Secretary to allow stocking in not more than 42 of the 91 lakes which have historically been stocked with fish.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Requires the Secretary to stock only fish that are: (1) native to the slope of the Cascade Range on which the lake to be stocked is located; and (2) non-reproducing, as identified in management alternative B of the North Cascades National Park Service Complex Mountain Lakes Fishery Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (June 2008).

Instructs the Secretary to take into consideration relevant scientific information, including such plan and the information gathered under the research and monitoring program specified below, in making fish stocking decisions under this Act.

Requires the Secretary to coordinate the stocking of fish with the state of Washington.

Requires the Secretary to continue, and report to Congress on, a program of research and monitoring of the impacts of fish stocking on the resources of the applicable unit of the North Cascades National Park Service Complex.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Hastings, Doc [R-WA-4] · R–WA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 113-137.

    2. Became Public Law No: 113-137.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    8. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4355-4364; text as passed Senate: CR S4356)

    9. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4355-4364; text as passed Senate: CR S4356)

    10. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.

    11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Landrieu without amendment. With written report No. 113-151.

    12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Landrieu without amendment. With written report No. 113-151.

    13. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    14. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 113-93.

    15. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    16. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    17. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3267)

    18. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H3267)

    19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1158.

    20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3267-3268)

    21. Mr. Hastings (WA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

    22. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 44.

    23. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-68.

    24. Reported by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 113-68.

    25. Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.

    26. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    27. Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Discharged.

    28. Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation.

    29. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

    30. Introduced in House

    31. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1158 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1158 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1158 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1158 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources