PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1157 / 107th Congress

Pacific Salmon Recovery Act

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 21, 2001

Pacific Salmon Recovery Act - Requires the Secretary of Commerce, subject to appropriations, to provide financial assistance for salmon conservation and habitat restoration activities to: (1) Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and California, and Idaho (qualified States); and (2) tribal governments in such States and Alaska Native villages or regional or village corporations that are involved in salmon management and recovery or conservation activities and have the organizational capability to maximize the benefits of assistance provided under this Act (qualified tribal governments). Allocates 85 percent of assistance per fiscal year equally among such States and 15 percent among qualified tribal governments.Requires qualified States, to receive assistance under this Act, to submit a Salmon Conservation and Salmon Habitat Restoration Plan to the Secretary. Directs qualified tribal governments, to receive such assistance, to enter into memoranda of understanding with the Secretary regarding use of the assistance.Requires funds allocated to qualified States to be used for local and regional projects.Permits the use of assistance outside the jurisdiction of the recipient if the assisted activity will provide conservation benefits to naturally produced salmon in streams of concern to the recipient.Requires States to match, in the aggregate, financial assistance provided under this Act.Directs States seeking assistance under this Act to establish citizens advisory committees or other similar fora for the public to participate in obtaining and using assistance under this Act. Requires qualified tribal governments to hold public meetings to receive recommendations on the use of such assistance.Includes: (1) Lahontan cutthroat trout and bull trout within the definition of "salmon" for purposes of applying this Act in Oregon; and (2) bull trout within such definition for purposes of applying this Act in Washington and Idaho.Amends the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 to extend the authorization of appropriations for capitalizing the Northern and Southern Funds under the 1999 Pacific Salmon Treaty Agreement through FY 2004.Directs the President, for U.S. citizens who served as employees of the International Pacific Salmon and North Pacific Fisheries Commissions who worked in Canada during the course of such employment, to: (1) calculate the difference in amount between the valuation of the Commissions' annuity for each employee's payment in U.S. and Canadian currency for past and future annuity payments; and (2) compensate such employees for past and future benefits resulting from the exchange rate inequity.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-1] · D–CA

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
  • Natural Resources Committee
66 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  2. The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 1157.

  3. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  4. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 6 (Roll no. 159).

    House roll call 159 · Individual votes
  5. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 6 (Roll no. 159).

    House roll call 159 · Individual votes
  6. The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

  7. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  8. The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1157.

  9. GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1157.

  10. The Speaker designated the Honorable Steven C. LaTourette to act as Chairman of the Committee.

  11. House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 163 and Rule XXIII.

  12. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1157 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. House Resolution 156 is laid on the table.

  13. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 163. (consideration: CR H3082-3092)

  14. Rule H. Res. 163 passed House.

  15. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 163 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1157 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments. House Resolution 156 is laid on the table.

  16. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 51.

  17. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-95.

  18. Reported by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 107-95.

  19. Executive Comment Received from Commerce.

  20. Executive Comment Received from State.

  21. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  22. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  23. Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans Discharged.

  24. Executive Comment Requested from Commerce.

  25. Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans.

  26. Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

  27. Introduced in House

  28. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1157 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1157 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1157 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1157 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources