PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent).
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 24, 1993
Intelligence Agencies Reorganization Act of 1993 - Directs the President to: (1) reorganize the U.S. intelligence community to reduce redundancy and overlapping jurisdiction of intelligence components and to centralize responsibility for intelligence activities; and (2) reduce, for each of FY 1993 through 1997, the total number of military and civilian personnel employed by, or assigned to, the intelligence community by at least four percent of the total number of such personnel as of September 30, 1992. Bars the reassignment of functions and personnel to avoid or reduce the effect of such reductions. Requires reductions in the number of members of the armed forces or civilian personnel in the intelligence community to be matched with corresponding reductions in the overall number of members of the armed forces or of civilian Government employees.
People & committees
Rep. Santorum, Rick [R-PA-18] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent).
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1127 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1127 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1127 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1127 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.