PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.112 / 119th Congress

FUEL Reform Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 3, 2025

Farewell to Unnecessary Energy Lifelines Reform Act of 2025 or the FUEL Reform Act

This bill repeals Title IX (Energy) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (i.e., the 2002 farm bill). The title authorizes various energy programs that are administered by the Department of Agriculture and primarily provide support and incentives for renewable energy projects. For example, these programs include the BioPreferred Program; the Rural Energy for America Program; and the Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing Assistance Program. 

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Agriculture Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.

    2. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    3. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    4. Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    5. Introduced in House

    6. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Apr 10, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.112 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.112 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.112 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.112 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 29, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-01-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This proposal would repeal an entire part of a 2002 farm law that the bill describes as covering Agriculture Department bioenergy subsidies and related subsidy programs. The underlying law is not reproduced, so the supplied evidence does not establish exactly which programs, recipients, or other activities would be affected.

    Check the source
    2. Repeal of Department of Agriculture bioenergy subsidy programs and other related subsidy programs Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8101 et seq.) is repealed.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    How it would work

    The bill names itself the Farewell to Unnecessary Energy Lifelines Reform Act of 2025 or the FUEL Reform Act and would repeal all of Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. Its repeal provision states no exceptions, transition arrangements, or implementation date.

    Check the sources
    1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Farewell to Unnecessary Energy Lifelines Reform Act of 2025 or the FUEL Reform Act.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03
    Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8101 et seq.) is repealed.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-01-03

    What the record shows

    The supplied April 10, 2025 source snapshot records introduction in the House on January 3, 2025, referrals that day to three committees, and referral on January 31 to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.

    Check the sources
    Source snapshot updated 2025-04-10T19:34:32Z.
    Official legislative record · 2025-04-10T19:34:32Z
    2025-01-03: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-04-10T19:34:32Z
    2025-01-03: Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
    Official legislative record · 2025-04-10T19:34:32Z
    2025-01-31: Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
    Official legislative record · 2025-04-10T19:34:32Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-01-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The referenced Title IX is not supplied. Its full scope, existing exceptions, funding rules, and consequences for current recipients or commitments cannot be established from this bundle.
    • The bill supplies no specific implementation date or transition rules; the evidence does not establish how existing obligations would be handled.
    • The introduced text is a proposal, not evidence of enacted law. The supplied action snapshot does not establish later legislative developments or enactment; missing actions do not prove that the bill never advanced.
    • No member earmark requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Apr 10, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI