PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1087 / 119th Congress

United States Colored Troops Congressional Gold Medal Act

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 6, 2025

United States Colored Troops Congressional Gold Medal Act

This bill provides for the award of a Congressional Gold Medal posthumously to the African Americans who served with Union forces in recognition of their bravery and outstanding service during the Civil War.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] · D–DC

Committees

  • Committee on House Administration
  • Financial Services Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E104-105)

  5. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1087 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1087 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1087 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1087 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 28, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-06 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed United States Colored Troops Congressional Gold Medal Act would honor African Americans who served with Union forces during the Civil War with one collective, posthumous Congressional Gold Medal. The Smithsonian would receive the medal for display and research. The Treasury Secretary could also make and sell bronze copies at a price covering their costs.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the United States Colored Troops Congressional Gold Medal Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
the posthumous presentation, on behalf of Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design to the African Americans who served with Union forces during the Civil War, collectively
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
the gold medal shall be given to the Smithsonian Institution, where the medal shall be available for display as appropriate and available for research.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
The Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the gold medal struck pursuant to section 3 at a price sufficient to cover the cost thereof
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

How it would work

The bill's findings explain the proposed honor by describing African-American soldiers' and sailors' service amid discrimination and danger. They also recognize women who served in support and intelligence roles despite being barred from formally enlisting.

Check the sources
Congress finds the following:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
African-American soldiers and sailors served with distinction, honor, and bravery amid racial discrimination and adverse circumstances, including the risk of enslavement and torture if captured.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
During the Civil War, African-American women were not allowed to formally enlist as soldiers or sailors, though they served as nurses, cooks, spies, and scouts for the Union Army and the Union Navy.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

The bill would require the House Speaker and the Senate's president pro tempore to arrange the collective, posthumous presentation on Congress's behalf, recognizing the recipients' bravery and outstanding Civil War service.

Check the source
The Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate shall make appropriate arrangements for the posthumous presentation, on behalf of Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design to the African Americans who served with Union forces during the Civil War, collectively, in recognition of their bravery and outstanding service during the Civil War.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

The Treasury Secretary would have to produce the gold medal and choose its emblems, designs, and inscriptions.

Check the source
the Secretary of the Treasury (hereafter in this Act referred to as the Secretary) shall strike a gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions, to be determined by the Secretary.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

After the award, the medal would go to the Smithsonian and be available for research and appropriate display. The bill also expresses Congress's nonbinding view that the Smithsonian should make it available for display elsewhere, particularly at locations associated with the United States Colored Troops.

Check the sources
Following the award of the gold medal under subsection (a), the gold medal shall be given to the Smithsonian Institution, where the medal shall be available for display as appropriate and available for research.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
It is the sense of Congress that the Smithsonian Institution should make the gold medal received under paragraph (1) available for display elsewhere, particularly at appropriate locations associated with the United States Colored Troops.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

The Treasury Secretary could, but would not have to, produce and sell bronze copies. Their price would have to cover costs, including labor, materials, production dies, machinery use, and overhead.

Check the source
The Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the gold medal struck pursuant to section 3 at a price sufficient to cover the cost thereof, including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, and overhead expenses.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

The bill would classify the medals as national medals under the cited federal coinage law and as numismatic items—items associated with coin and medal collecting—for the cited Mint fund provision. The referenced statutory rules are not reproduced in the bundle.

Check the sources
The medals struck pursuant to this Act are national medals for purposes of chapter 51 of title 31, United States Code.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
For purposes of section 5134 of title 31, United States Code, all medals struck under this Act shall be considered to be numismatic items.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

The bill would authorize charging the medals' necessary costs to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund, without specifying a dollar amount. Revenue from bronze-copy sales would have to be deposited in that fund.

Check the sources
There is authorized to be charged against the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund such amounts as may be necessary to pay for the cost of the medals struck under this Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
Amounts received from the sale of duplicate bronze medals under section 4 shall be deposited in the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

What the record shows

The supplied actions snapshot, updated December 5, 2025, records introduction in the House on February 6, 2025, and referral that day to the Financial Services and House Administration committees for consideration of provisions within their respective jurisdictions.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2025-12-05T21:21:17Z.
Official legislative record · 2025-12-05T21:21:17Z
2025-02-06: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-12-05T21:21:17Z
2025-02-06: Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2025-12-05T21:21:17Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-06. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No earmark was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. The medal-production funding authorization does not by itself establish an earmark. This conclusion is limited to this version and does not resolve formal status in accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No separate narrow exemption or preferential treatment warranting a finding was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. The commemorative recipients and medal custody arrangements implement the bill's main purpose. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • This analysis concerns the complete supplied introduced text. The actions snapshot does not establish passage or enactment; missing later actions do not prove the bill never advanced or became law.
  • The bundle does not reproduce chapter 51 or section 5134 of title 31, so it does not establish all consequences of the medal classifications.
  • The text supplies no fixed implementation date, presentation deadline, expiration date, or cost estimate. Authorization to charge the Mint fund does not establish how much would actually be spent.
  • Member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, and conference materials are not supplied, limiting conclusions about formal earmark status and attachment history.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Dec 5, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI