PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 9, 2026
340B Rebate Model Delay ActThis bill temporarily limits the use of rebates for prescription drugs under the 340B program and delays the implementation of the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program.Under current law, the 340B program generally limits the maximum price drug manufacturers participating in Medicaid or Medicare can charge eligible health care organizations for covered outpatient drugs. Beginning on January 1, 2027, and ending on December 31, 2028, the bill prohibits drug manufacturers from entering agreements with 340B organizations that require the organization to pay more than the allowable ceiling price for a covered outpatient drug at the time of purchase and subsequently receive a rebate to comply with the maximum price requirements.
The bill also delays until January 1, 2029, the implementation of the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program. The pilot program allows approved drug manufacturers to charge 340B organizations full price for certain high-impact drugs and provide a rebate that reduces the amount paid to the allowable ceiling price after the drug is dispensed. Under the pilot program, the rebates are verified and issued on a claim-by-claim basis.
People & committees
Rep. Bresnahan, Robert P. [R-PA-8] · R–PA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Nov 2, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.10770 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.10770 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.10770 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.10770 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.