PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1063 / 104th Congress

Derivatives Dealers Act of 1995

Referred to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 27, 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Derivatives Dealers Title II: Broker-Dealer Oversight Reforms Derivatives Dealers Act of 1995 - Title I: Derivatives Dealers - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to set forth registration requirements and procedures for derivatives dealers. Directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to adopt rules with respect to dealer financial responsibility and mandatory annual reports. Grants the SEC enforcement powers. Mandates securities association membership for derivatives dealers. Title II: Broker-Dealer Oversight Reforms - Permits a national securities exchange to adopt and implement rules for members and material associated persons engaged in derivatives transactions for which such exchange is the designated examining authority in order to enforce compliance with this Act. (Sec.205) Prescribes, for risk assessment purposes, derivatives transaction recordkeeping and reporting requirements for: (1) government securities brokers and dealers; and (2) brokers and dealers.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA-7] · D–MA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance.

    2. Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.

    3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E447-448)

    4. Introduced in House

    5. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.1063 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.1063 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.1063 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.1063 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources