PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.10553 / 119th Congress

Margin Eligibility Modernization Act

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2] · R–NY

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Oct 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.10553 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.10553 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.10553 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.10553 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 26, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-09-24 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposed Margin Eligibility Modernization Act would change which ownership securities traded outside stock exchanges qualify as “OTC margin stock,” a regulatory category related to securities credit. It would include any such security meeting a referenced “ready market” definition. The Federal Reserve would have 90 days after enactment to issue a rule, with an automatic interim change if it missed that deadline.

Check the sources
This Act may be cited as the Margin Eligibility Modernization Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall issue a rule to amend section 220.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, to revise the definition of OTC margin stock to include any equity security traded over the counter for which there is a ready market, as defined in section 240.15c3–1(c)(11) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24
If the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System does not issue the rule required under subsection (a) before the end of the 90-day period described in subsection (a), until such rule is issued, the definition of OTC margin stock under section 220.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, is deemed to include any equity security traded over the counter for which there is a ready market
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24

How it would work

The bill would require the Federal Reserve Board to amend the regulatory definition of OTC margin stock within 90 days after enactment. Coverage would include any over-the-counter equity security—an ownership investment traded outside stock exchanges—that meets the “ready market” definition in the specified federal regulation. The bill does not reproduce that eligibility test.

Check the source
(a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall issue a rule to amend section 220.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, to revise the definition of OTC margin stock to include any equity security traded over the counter for which there is a ready market, as defined in section 240.15c3–1(c)(11) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24

If the Federal Reserve missed the 90-day deadline, the regulatory definition would automatically be treated as including the specified securities. This interim treatment would last until the required rule was issued.

Check the source
(b) Effect of failure To issue rule If the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System does not issue the rule required under subsection (a) before the end of the 90-day period described in subsection (a), until such rule is issued, the definition of OTC margin stock under section 220.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, is deemed to include any equity security traded over the counter for which there is a ready market, as defined in section 240.15c3–1(c)(11) of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24

Five years after the required rule was issued, the Federal Reserve would have to report on credit extended because of the rule and any associated risks to the financial system. The report would go to the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. This reporting clock would start with issuance of the rule, rather than enactment.

Check the source
(c) Report to Congress At the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date the rule required under subsection (a) is issued, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report assessing the credit extended by reason of such rule and any associated risks to the financial system.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-24

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated October 10, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Financial Services Committee on September 24, 2026.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-10-10T08:05:27Z. 2026-09-24: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. 2026-09-24: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-10-10T08:05:27Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-09-24. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; member disclosures, committee reports, and conference materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment warranting a separate finding was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied full text is the introduced version. The dated actions snapshot does not establish subsequent advancement or enactment; the provisions are described as proposals.
  • The existing OTC margin stock definition, the referenced ready-market test, and surrounding credit rules are not supplied. The evidence therefore does not establish precisely which securities would newly qualify or all conditions governing credit involving them.
  • The bundle contains no assessment of how much additional credit the change would produce or its financial-system risks. Requiring a future report does not establish those outcomes.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Oct 10, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI