PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.1052 / 119th Congress

UNPLUG EVs Act

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7] · R–MO

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Appropriations Committee
18 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  4. Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  5. Introduced in House

  6. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: May 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.1052 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.1052 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.1052 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.1052 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 25, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-06 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The proposal would cancel funding not yet legally committed for charging and fueling grants and the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program. This would withdraw money available through those programs and send it to the Treasury’s general fund solely for deficit reduction. The cancellation would cover uncommitted balances, rather than all funding previously provided.

Check the sources
The unobligated balances of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out section 151(f) of title 23, United States Code, are hereby rescinded and shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06
The unobligated balances of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program pursuant to paragraph (2) under the heading Federal Highway Administration of title VIII of division J of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117–58) are hereby rescinded and shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

How it would work

Section 2 would cancel the uncommitted balances of funding provided to carry out 23 U.S.C. 151(f), identified by the section heading as charging and fueling grants. It would require depositing those balances into the Treasury’s general fund solely for deficit reduction.

Check the source
2. Rescission of unobligated charging and fueling grant funds The unobligated balances of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out section 151(f) of title 23, United States Code, are hereby rescinded and shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

Section 3 would separately cancel the uncommitted balances of funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program under the specified provision of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It would require the same deposit into the Treasury’s general fund solely for deficit reduction.

Check the source
The unobligated balances of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program pursuant to paragraph (2) under the heading Federal Highway Administration of title VIII of division J of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117–58) are hereby rescinded and shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-06

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated May 23, 2025, records House introduction on February 6, 2025, and referrals that day to the Appropriations, Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure committees, and to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2025-05-23T16:27:13Z.
Official legislative record · 2025-05-23T16:27:13Z
2025-02-06: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2025-05-23T16:27:13Z
2025-02-06: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Official legislative record · 2025-05-23T16:27:13Z
2025-02-06: Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2025-05-23T16:27:13Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-06. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No provision unrelated to the funding cancellations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not cover other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish formal earmark status in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow exemption, carve-out, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not cover other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied full text is the introduced proposal, not evidence of enacted law. The May 23, 2025 actions snapshot does not establish subsequent advancement or enactment; missing later actions do not prove that neither occurred.
  • The referenced program statutes are not reproduced. The bundle does not establish detailed eligibility rules, particular affected recipients or projects, the balances available for cancellation, or the amount of any resulting deficit reduction.
  • The proposal specifies no separate implementation date, transfer deadline, enforcement process, or termination condition.
  • No earmark disclosures, member requests, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied. The category findings are limited to the supplied introduced text.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: May 23, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI