PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Congressional Research Service
No official summary is available in the imported record yet.
People & committees
Rep. Gonzalez, Vicente [D-TX-34] · D–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 29, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.10391 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.10391 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.10391 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.10391 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
PlainBill explanation
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-09-15 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
The proposed National Risk Assessments Extension Act would update an existing law concerning federal planning against terrorist and other illegal financing. It would replace two year references with later years and replace references to two national strategies with three 2026 risk assessments. The supplied text does not show the underlying requirements or establish who must comply with them.
This Act may be cited as the National Risk Assessments Extension Act.
Updates to the national strategy for combating terrorist and other illicit financing
(1) in section 261(b)(2)— (A) by striking 2024 and inserting 2028; and (B) by striking 2026 and inserting 2030;
(2) in section 262(1), by striking in the documents entitled 2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing and 2022 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing and inserting in the documents entitled 2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, 2026 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment, and 2026 National Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment.
The bill would amend section 261(b)(2) of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017, replacing 2024 with 2028 and 2026 with 2030. These are changes to year references; the supplied text does not reproduce the requirements those years govern.
The Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (title II of Public Law 115–44) is amended— (1) in section 261(b)(2)— (A) by striking 2024 and inserting 2028; and (B) by striking 2026 and inserting 2030;
In section 262(1) of that law, the bill would replace references to the 2020 and 2022 National Strategies for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing with references to three documents: the 2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, 2026 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment, and 2026 National Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment. The amendment changes which documents are referenced without reproducing their contents.
(2) in section 262(1), by striking in the documents entitled 2020 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing and 2022 National Strategy for Combating Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing and inserting in the documents entitled 2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, 2026 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment, and 2026 National Proliferation Financing Risk Assessment.
The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated September 29, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Financial Services on September 15, 2026. It does not establish subsequent action or enactment.
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-29T14:32:38Z. 2026-09-15: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. 2026-09-15: Introduced in House
A closer look
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-09-15. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not extend to other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow exemption, carve-out, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not resolve the effects of statutory context that was not supplied.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 29, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI