PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.10346 / 119th Congress

Stop China’s Exploitation of Congolese Children and Adult Forced Labor through Cobalt Mining Act

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 8.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 10, 2026

Stop China’s Exploitation of Congolese Children and Adult Forced Labor through Cobalt Mining Act

This bill requires the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force to complete and submit to Congress the results of an investigation into the alleged use of forced labor in the cobalt mining industry of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Specifically, the task force must (1) submit to Congress strategies for preventing the importation of cobalt mined using forced labor, and (2) provide semiannual briefings to Congress.

This requirement ceases to have effect on the earlier of (1) eight years after the date of enactment, or (2) the date on which the President submits to Congress a determination that forced labor in the DRC mining industry has ended.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4] · R–NJ

Committees

  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 8.

    2. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

    3. Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

    4. Introduced in House

    5. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 28, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.R.10346 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.R.10346 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.R.10346 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.R.10346 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 24, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-09-10 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This bill would require a federal task force to investigate alleged forced labor in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It would require strategies for keeping cobalt mined with forced labor out of the United States, including when it arrives through other countries or in products containing cobalt. The work would guide import enforcement and require ongoing reporting to Congress.

    Check the sources
    shall complete and submit to the appropriate congressional committees the results of an investigation into the alleged use of forced labor in the cobalt mining industry of the DRC
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    contains a strategy to ensure that cobalt mined by forced labor does not enter the United States market as goods imported from third countries
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    categories of downstream products that include cobalt mined in the DRC and are, therefore, identified as priority sectors for enforcement
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force shall provide briefings to the appropriate congressional committees on a semiannual basis
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    The term DRC means the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    How it would work

    The bill’s findings describe cobalt’s use in batteries, reported Chinese company ownership of Congolese mines, and concerns about forced labor, including child labor. These are statements presented in the bill’s findings, rather than independently verified conclusions of this analysis.

    Check the sources
    Cobalt is an essential component of most lithium-ion batteries, which are key components in many smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles, among other electronic devices.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    Fifteen of the DRC’s 19 cobalt mines are reportedly owned wholly or in part by companies located in the People’s Republic of China.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    Numerous analysts report significant concerns with forced labor, including forced or indentured child labor, in the DRC mining industry.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    Within 180 days after enactment, the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force would have to complete its investigation and submit the results to the House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee. It would consult the heads of other relevant federal agencies.

    Check the sources
    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force, established under section 741 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 4682), in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall complete and submit to the appropriate congressional committees the results of an investigation
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Finance of the Senate.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The investigation would have to include a strategy to enforce the existing forced-labor import restriction in section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Required measures would trace goods’ origins, make cobalt supply chains more transparent, and seek to keep cobalt mined with forced labor out of the United States.

    Check the sources
    Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) states that it is illegal to import into the United States goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor, including forced or indentured child labor.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    contains a strategy for the United States Government to effectively enforce section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) to prevent the importation into the United States of cobalt mined by forced labor that includes measures that— (A) can trace the origin of goods and offer greater supply chain transparency relating to cobalt from the DRC; and (B) ensure that cobalt mined by forced labor does not enter the United States
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    Separate required strategies would address cobalt mined with forced labor arriving in goods from other countries and cobalt entering later after previously being denied entry.

    Check the source
    (2) contains a strategy to ensure that cobalt mined by forced labor does not enter the United States market as goods imported from third countries; and (3) contains a strategy to ensure that cobalt mined by forced labor and denied entry to the United States market does not later enter the United States market.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The investigation would list entities in the Congo that potentially mine or process cobalt using forced labor. It would also identify categories of products containing Congolese cobalt as enforcement priorities; that product-category list would not be limited to products already proven to involve forced labor.

    Check the source
    A list of— (A) entities in the DRC that potentially mine or process cobalt using forced labor; and (B) categories of downstream products that include cobalt mined in the DRC and are, therefore, identified as priority sectors for enforcement under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The investigation would recommend efforts and technologies to help U.S. Customs and Border Protection identify and trace Congolese cobalt mined with forced labor. It would explain how the entity list would be regularly updated and reported to the designated congressional committees.

    Check the source
    (2) Recommendations for efforts, initiatives, and tools and technologies to be adopted to ensure that U.S. Customs and Border Protection can accurately identify and trace cobalt mined by forced labor in the DRC. (3) A description of how the list of entities required by subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) shall be regularly updated and reported to the appropriate congressional committees.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The investigation would include a strategy for working with nongovernmental organizations and private businesses or other private-sector entities to implement enforcement and create and update the entity list.

    Check the source
    A strategy to coordinate and collaborate with appropriate nongovernmental organizations and private sector entities to implement the enforcement strategy for cobalt mined with forced labor and to create and update the list of entities required in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The report and any publicly published updates would have to be submitted in unclassified form. A classified attachment could be included if necessary.

    Check the source
    The report required by subsection (a) and any publicly published updates described by subsection (d) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex, if necessary.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    After submitting the strategy, the task force would brief the designated congressional committees every six months. As applicable, briefings would cover strategy updates, additional actions against forced-labor cobalt imports, and Customs and Border Protection’s enforcement involving Congolese cobalt.

    Check the source
    After the submission of the strategy required by subsection (a), the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force shall provide briefings to the appropriate congressional committees on a semiannual basis and, as applicable, on— (1) any updates to the strategy required by subsection (a); (2) any additional actions taken to prevent the importation of cobalt mined with forced labor, including actions described in this Act; and (3) any action U.S. Customs and Border Protection has taken to enforce section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) with respect to cobalt mined in the DRC.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    Section 3’s investigation, strategy, and reporting requirements would end eight years after enactment, or sooner if the President submitted a determination to the designated committees that forced labor in the Congo’s mining industry had ended.

    Check the source
    This section shall cease to have effect on the earlier of— (1) the date that is 8 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or (2) the date on which the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees a determination that forced labor in the DRC mining industry has ended.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    The bill defines artisanal and small-scale mining as mining with little or no machinery, including intensive use of hand tools. It adopts the meaning of forced labor from section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 rather than reproducing that definition.

    Check the sources
    The term artisanal and small-scale mining— (A) means mining with minimal to no mechanization; and (B) includes the use of intensive hand tools.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10
    The term forced labor has the meaning given that term in section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307).
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-09-10

    What the record shows

    The supplied September 28, 2026 source snapshot records introduction and referral to House Ways and Means on September 10, 2026. It records committee consideration on September 16 and an order to report the bill with substitute text by a 32–8 vote. This records committee action, not passage by the full House or enactment.

    Check the source
    Source snapshot updated 2026-09-28T15:28:32Z. 2026-09-16: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 8. 2026-09-16: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held 2026-09-10: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. 2026-09-10: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2026-09-28T15:28:32Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-09-10. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow preferential benefit, carve-out, or special exemption was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The supplied full text is the introduced version. The substitute text referenced in the action record is absent, so this analysis cannot establish what changes the committee approved.
    • The dated action snapshot does not establish later legislative developments or enactment. The provisions are described as proposals; missing later history does not prove the bill failed to advance or become law.
    • The full text of the referenced existing statutes is not supplied, including the incorporated definition of forced labor. Their complete scope cannot be determined from this bundle.
    • The underlying sources for the bill’s findings are not supplied. Its reported statistics, allegations, and demand projections are not independently established by this evidence.
    • Member earmark requests, disclosures, committee reports, and conference materials are not supplied, limiting assessment of formal earmark status.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 28, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI