No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.10292 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.10292 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.10292 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.10292 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 23, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-09-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
This bill would transfer about 257 acres of federal land to the Clark County Water Reclamation District in Clark County, Nevada, without a purchase payment. The land would have to serve public purposes, which could include wastewater infrastructure. The district would pay the transfer’s administrative costs, and any parcel that stopped serving public purposes would return to federal ownership.
Check the sources
(1) District The term District means the Clark County Water Reclamation District in Clark County, Nevada. (2) Federal land The term Federal land means approximately 257 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management
the Secretary shall convey to the District, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land, to be used for public purposes, including but not limited to the construction, operation, and management of infrastructure operated by the District to support the provision of critical wastewater services.
As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (a), the District shall pay all administrative costs, including land surveys, associated with the conveyance.
If any parcel of Federal land conveyed under subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes, the parcel of Federal land shall revert to the United States.
The proposed transfer covers approximately 257 acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management and identified on its May 19, 2026 map. The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the bureau’s director, would administer the transfer.
Check the source
(2) Federal land The term Federal land means approximately 257 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management and designated as Federal Land to be Conveyed on the map prepared by the Bureau of Land Management entitled Southern Nevada Wastewater Infrastructure Lands Map and dated May 19, 2026. (3) Secretary The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
The Secretary would have to transfer all federal ownership interests within 180 days after receiving the district’s request. The transfer would be subject to valid and existing rights and proceed notwithstanding the land-use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
Check the source
Notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), and subject to valid and existing rights, not later than 180 days after receiving a request from the District, the Secretary shall convey to the District, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land
Although the district would not pay a purchase price, it would have to pay all administrative costs associated with the transfer, including land surveys.
Check the sources
the Secretary shall convey to the District, without consideration
As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (a), the District shall pay all administrative costs, including land surveys, associated with the conveyance.
As soon as practicable after enactment, the Secretary would have to prepare maps and legal descriptions identifying the parcels. The Secretary could correct minor errors, and the documents would have to be available for public inspection at the appropriate Bureau of Land Management offices.
Check the source
(1) In general As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare maps and legal descriptions of the parcels of Federal land to be conveyed under subsection (a). (2) Corrections The Secretary may correct any minor errors in the maps or legal descriptions prepared under paragraph (1). (3) Availability The maps and legal descriptions prepared under paragraph (1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
The land’s permitted public uses would not be limited to wastewater infrastructure. If any transferred parcel stopped being used for public purposes, that parcel would have to return to federal ownership.
Check the sources
to be used for public purposes, including but not limited to the construction, operation, and management of infrastructure operated by the District to support the provision of critical wastewater services.
(d) Reversion If any parcel of Federal land conveyed under subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes, the parcel of Federal land shall revert to the United States.
The supplied actions snapshot, updated September 10, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Natural Resources on September 3, 2026.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-10T20:23:37Z.
2026-09-03: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
2026-09-03: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-09-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending earmark was identified in the complete supplied introduced text under the stated definition. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials. The source set cannot establish formal earmark status.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
Findings to examine
The cited finding identifies narrow preferential treatment under the targeted-benefits definition. Classification does not imply impropriety.
The Clark County Water Reclamation District would receive the specified federal land without paying a purchase price, through a conveyance that would proceed notwithstanding the specified land-use planning requirements. This recipient-specific benefit is central to the bill’s public-purpose land transfer, including support for wastewater infrastructure. It would remain subject to valid and existing rights, payment of administrative costs, and reversion if public use ceased.
Check the sources
(1) District The term District means the Clark County Water Reclamation District in Clark County, Nevada.
Notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), and subject to valid and existing rights, not later than 180 days after receiving a request from the District, the Secretary shall convey to the District, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land, to be used for public purposes, including but not limited to the construction, operation, and management of infrastructure operated by the District to support the provision of critical wastewater services.
As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (a), the District shall pay all administrative costs, including land surveys, associated with the conveyance.
If any parcel of Federal land conveyed under subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes, the parcel of Federal land shall revert to the United States.
The supplied text is the introduced version. The September 10, 2026 actions snapshot does not establish subsequent legislative action or enactment; the provisions are described as proposals.
The referenced May 19, 2026 map is not supplied, so the exact parcel boundaries and the acreage’s location within Clark County cannot be established from this bundle.
The referenced federal land-use planning provisions are not reproduced. The bundle supports identifying the stated exception, but not a detailed account of the procedures it would bypass.
The bundle supplies no land valuation or administrative cost estimate, so the transfer’s financial value cannot be quantified.
Member earmark requests, disclosures, committee reports, and conference materials are not supplied. Formal earmark status cannot be established from this source set.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 10, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI