No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 22, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.R.10286 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.R.10286 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.R.10286 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.R.10286 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 23, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-09-03 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
The proposal would limit concession prices at publicly supported venues with at least 10,000 seats, excluding venues at higher education institutions. For concessions sold under covered space-rental agreements, prices could be no more than 7 percent above comparable prices in the nearest metropolitan area. It would also require qualified efforts to encourage rental opportunities for small businesses and prohibit charging them a fee for the right to sell, while allowing commercial leases and certain cost reimbursements.
Check the sources
(4) Covered stadium The term covered stadium— (A) means a venue that— (i) receives public funding; and (ii) has a capacity of at least 10,000 seats; and (B) does not include any venue at an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)).
(A) for any commercial lease with respect to the covered stadium, to the extent possible, ensure that any contract for concessions services encourages a provider of concessions services to make available to small businesses concessions locations for lease or sublicense; and (B) for any concessions sold or offered for sale at the covered stadium by an entity pursuant to a lease described in subparagraph (A), ensure the price of such concessions is not more than 7 percent higher than market rate.
(5) Market rate The term market rate, with respect to a good or service sold or offered for sale, means the price of a comparable good or service sold or offered for sale in the nearest metropolitan area (as determined by the Office of Management and Budget).
(2) Prohibition (A) In general A covered stadium, with respect to a small business, may not charge a fee for the right to sell or offer for sale any concessions to a patron who attends an event at the covered stadium. (B) Rule of construction Nothing in subparagraph (A) may be construed to prohibit any agreement with respect to— (i) the reimbursement of actual operating costs, utility charges, or equipment purchases or improvements; or (ii) a commercial lease.
The proposed rules would cover venues receiving public funding with capacity for at least 10,000 seats. Venues at qualifying higher education institutions would be excluded. Public funding would include federal grants and subsidies, tax exemptions, tax abatements—reductions in taxes owed—and borrowing through tax-exempt bonds.
Check the sources
(4) Covered stadium The term covered stadium— (A) means a venue that— (i) receives public funding; and (ii) has a capacity of at least 10,000 seats; and (B) does not include any venue at an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)).
(6) Public funding The term public funding includes the following: (A) A Federal grant. (B) A Federal subsidy. (C) A tax exemption. (D) A tax abatement. (E) A tax-exempt bond issuance.
For concession-space agreements, covered venues would have to ensure, to the extent possible, that concession-service contracts encourage providers to make locations available for small businesses to rent or sublicense. This is a qualified requirement to encourage opportunities, rather than a guarantee that a small business receives a location. Covered agreements would include leases, licenses, sublicenses and other arrangements for renting concession space.
Check the sources
(1) Requirements A covered stadium shall— (A) for any commercial lease with respect to the covered stadium, to the extent possible, ensure that any contract for concessions services encourages a provider of concessions services to make available to small businesses concessions locations for lease or sublicense;
(1) Commercial lease The term commercial lease means a lease, license, sublicense or other agreement for the purpose of renting a space to sell concessions.
Covered venues would have to ensure that concession prices charged or offered by entities operating under the specified rental agreements are no more than 7 percent above market rate. The benchmark would be the price of a comparable good or service sold or offered in the nearest metropolitan area, as determined by the Office of Management and Budget. The price rule is not expressly limited to small-business sellers.
Check the sources
(B) for any concessions sold or offered for sale at the covered stadium by an entity pursuant to a lease described in subparagraph (A), ensure the price of such concessions is not more than 7 percent higher than market rate.
(5) Market rate The term market rate, with respect to a good or service sold or offered for sale, means the price of a comparable good or service sold or offered for sale in the nearest metropolitan area (as determined by the Office of Management and Budget).
Covered venues could not charge small businesses a fee for the right to sell or offer concessions to people attending an event at the venue.
Check the source
(2) Prohibition (A) In general A covered stadium, with respect to a small business, may not charge a fee for the right to sell or offer for sale any concessions to a patron who attends an event at the covered stadium.
The fee prohibition would still allow commercial leases and agreements to reimburse actual operating costs, utility charges, or equipment purchases or improvements. It would therefore not require free concession space or prohibit all payments by small businesses.
Check the source
(B) Rule of construction Nothing in subparagraph (A) may be construed to prohibit any agreement with respect to— (i) the reimbursement of actual operating costs, utility charges, or equipment purchases or improvements; or (ii) a commercial lease.
The proposal would define concessions by reference to the federal food-law definition of food, and small businesses by reference to the Small Business Act's definition of a small business concern. Those definitions are not reproduced in the supplied text.
Check the sources
(3) Concessions The term concessions has the same meaning given the term food in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).
(7) Small business The term small business has the meaning given the term small business concern in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).
The Federal Trade Commission would enforce the proposed requirements and fee prohibition. Violations would be treated as violations of a federal rule against unfair or deceptive practices, using the enforcement powers, penalties and legal protections incorporated from the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Check the sources
(b) Enforcement (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices A violation of subsection (a) shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
(2) Powers of the Commission The Commission shall enforce subsection (a) in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this section, and any person who violates such subsection shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act.
The supplied actions snapshot, updated September 22, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on September 3, 2026.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-22T18:34:59Z.
2026-09-03: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
2026-09-03: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-09-03. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated rider was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the absence of riders in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish what other versions or disclosure materials contain.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
Findings to examine
The supplied introduced text contains an institutional exemption from the main regulatory policy. Identifying it does not establish that the exemption is unjustified.
Venues at qualifying higher education institutions would be exempt from the proposed stadium rules even if they receive public funding and have at least 10,000 seats. This gives those venues an institutional carve-out from the price and concession requirements that would otherwise apply.
Check the source
(4) Covered stadium The term covered stadium— (A) means a venue that— (i) receives public funding; and (ii) has a capacity of at least 10,000 seats; and (B) does not include any venue at an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)).
The supplied bill is the introduced version. The dated actions snapshot does not establish later advancement or enactment; its lack of later entries does not prove that neither occurred.
The referenced statutory definitions of food, small business concern and institution of higher education are not supplied. The Federal Trade Commission Act's incorporated enforcement provisions are also absent, so the precise coverage, penalties and legal protections cannot be fully described from this bundle.
The text does not specify an implementation date, transition rules for existing contracts, an expiration date or termination conditions.
The text does not explain how to choose among comparable products or differing prices within the nearest metropolitan area, or how to determine when encouraging small-business rental opportunities is possible.
Committee reports, amendment history and earmark disclosures are not supplied. The riders and benefits review is limited to the introduced full text.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 22, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI