PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 14, 2001
Community Recognition Act of 2001 - Authorizes the chief elected official of a locality, in the event of the death of a present or former official of that locality, to proclaim that the national flag shall be flown at half staff.
People & committees
Rep. Doolittle, John T. [R-CA-4] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: (3/5 required): 420 - 0 (Roll no. 492).
House roll call 492 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: (3/5 required): 420 - 0 (Roll no. 492).
House roll call 492 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9310)
VOTE POSTPONED ON FINAL PASSAGE - At the conclusion of debate on the bill, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote, announced that 3/5 of those present had voted in the affirmative. Mr. Tauzin demanded the Yeas and Nays and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of passage until Wednesday, December 12, 2001.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1022.
Considered from the Corrections Calendar. (consideration: CR H9192-9193; text of measure as reported in House: CR H9192)
Called up from the Corrections Calendar for consideration.
Placed on the Corrections Calendar, Calendar No. 1.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 183.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-305.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 107-305.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee on the Constitution Discharged.
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.1022 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.1022 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.1022 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.1022 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.