PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 5, 1993
National Voter Registration Enhancement Act of 1993 - Title I: Voter Registration Enhancement - Authorizes appropriations to the Attorney General for block grants to States to enhance voter registration for elections for Federal office, including registration at State departments of motor vehicles. Makes the Attorney General and the chief election officials of each State responsible for coordination of respective Federal and State functions. Title II: Public Corruption - Sets forth criminal penalties for using interstate commerce to defraud citizens of the honest services of government officials or for fraudulently conducted elections.
People & committees
Rep. Michel, Robert H. [R-IL-18] · R–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Elections.
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E55)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.R.102 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.R.102 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.R.102 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.R.102 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.