PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.R.10162 / 119th Congress

STORMWATER Act

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26] · D–NY

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
5 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  2. Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Oct 6, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.R.10162 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.R.10162 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.R.10162 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.R.10162 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 22, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-08-27 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

The bill would change a federal program for centers focused on stormwater infrastructure technologies. It would require exactly five centers, including one located in and focused on the Great Lakes region. It would also change fiscal years 2022–2026 to 2027–2031 in an existing centers provision and in the authorization of appropriations. These are proposed changes; the supplied record does not establish enactment.

Check the sources
Centers of excellence for stormwater control infrastructure technologies
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
by striking not less than 3, and not more than 5, centers and inserting 5 centers
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
Of the centers established under paragraph (1)(A), 1 shall be located in, and focused on, the Great Lakes region.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
in paragraph (4), by striking fiscal years 2022 through 2026 and inserting fiscal years 2027 through 2031
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
(b) Authorization of appropriations Section 50217(e)(1) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (33 U.S.C. 1302f(e)(1)) is amended by striking fiscal years 2022 through 2026 and inserting fiscal years 2027 through 2031.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
Source snapshot updated 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z. 2026-08-27: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z

How it would work

Section 1 would name the legislation the STORMWATER Act.

Check the source
This Act may be cited as the Stormwater Treatment Optimization, Resilience, and Management With Academic Technological Expertise and Research Act or the STORMWATER Act.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

The bill would replace the existing requirement for three to five stormwater technology centers with a requirement for exactly five.

Check the source
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking not less than 3, and not more than 5, centers and inserting 5 centers
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

One of those five centers would have to be located in the Great Lakes region and focus on that region. This would reserve a place within the five-center program, rather than create an additional center.

Check the source
(4) Great Lakes center Of the centers established under paragraph (1)(A), 1 shall be located in, and focused on, the Great Lakes region.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

The bill would change the fiscal-year range in the existing centers provision, paragraph (4), from 2022–2026 to 2027–2031 and renumber it as paragraph (5). The supplied text does not reproduce that paragraph's other terms.

Check the source
(2) in paragraph (4), by striking fiscal years 2022 through 2026 and inserting fiscal years 2027 through 2031; (3) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5)
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

The bill would also replace fiscal years 2022–2026 with 2027–2031 in the authorization of appropriations. This amendment does not itself appropriate money or state a dollar amount; the supplied text does not reproduce the authorization's other terms.

Check the source
(b) Authorization of appropriations Section 50217(e)(1) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (33 U.S.C. 1302f(e)(1)) is amended by striking fiscal years 2022 through 2026 and inserting fiscal years 2027 through 2031.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

What the record shows

The October 6, 2026 source snapshot records introduction in the House on August 27, 2026, and referral that day to the Science, Space, and Technology Committee and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, each for provisions within its jurisdiction.

Check the sources
Source snapshot updated 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z.
Official legislative record · 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z
2026-08-27: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z
2026-08-27: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Official legislative record · 2026-10-06T08:05:56Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-08-27. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish what appears in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending allocation to a particular recipient or place was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; formal earmark status cannot be established without relevant accompanying materials, and this finding does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

Findings to examine

The supplied introduced text contains a narrow geographic preference within the bill's main program. This classification does not establish improper purpose or waste.

The Great Lakes region would receive a guaranteed location and regional focus for one of the five stormwater technology centers. This is a geographic preference within the main policy; the text does not name a particular institution or award a specific amount.

Check the sources
by striking not less than 3, and not more than 5, centers and inserting 5 centers
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27
(4) Great Lakes center Of the centers established under paragraph (1)(A), 1 shall be located in, and focused on, the Great Lakes region.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-08-27

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The bundle contains the complete introduced bill, but not the full existing statute it would amend. Funding amounts, the function of existing paragraph (4), and existing eligibility, selection, administration, and enforcement rules cannot be determined from this bundle.
  • The introduced text specifies revised fiscal-year ranges but supplies no separate effective date or express program termination condition. The end of an authorization period should not be treated as proof that the program itself terminates.
  • The supplied actions snapshot contains introduction and referral entries only. It does not establish whether the bill subsequently advanced or became law.
  • No member funding requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, conference materials, or other bill versions are supplied. Formal earmark status and provisions in other materials cannot be assessed.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Oct 6, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI