POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on agreeing to H.J. Res. 90 and announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Paul objected to the voice vote and demanded the yeas-and-nays. The Chair postponed further proceedigns until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with two hours of debate on H.J. Res. 90.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 90 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 528. (consideration: CR H4793-4814)
Rule H. Res. 528 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 528 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 90 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4657-4658)
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 376.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 106-672.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 106-672.
Ordered to be Reported Adversely by the Yeas and Nays: 35 - 0.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2393-2398)
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: May 13, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.J.Res.90 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.J.Res.90 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.J.Res.90 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.J.Res.90 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.