PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.J.Res.85 / 119th Congress

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to Israel of certain defense articles and services.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 31, 2025

This joint resolution prohibits a proposed foreign military sale of certain defense articles and services to Israel.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12] · D–MI

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
16 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jul 3, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.J.Res.85 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.J.Res.85 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.J.Res.85 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.J.Res.85 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 20, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-31 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This joint resolution would prohibit a specific proposed military sale to Israel involving 1,000-pound bomb bodies and bomb-guidance kits. It targets the sale identified in a notification to Congress numbered 25–26.

Check the sources
That the following proposed foreign military sale to Israel is prohibited: (1) The sale of the following defense articles and services, described in Transmittal No. 25–26
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31
submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1))
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31
two hundred one (201) MK 83 MOD 4/MOD 5 General Purpose 1,000-pound bomb bodies; four thousand seven hundred ninety-nine (4,799) BLU–110A/B General Purpose 1,000-pound bomb bodies; one thousand five hundred (1,500) KMU–559C/B Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance kits for the MK 83 bomb body; and three thousand five hundred (3,500) KMU–559J/B JDAM guidance kits for the MK 83 bomb body.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31

How it would work

The proposed prohibition covers the sale of 201 MK 83 MOD 4/MOD 5 bomb bodies and 4,799 BLU–110A/B bomb bodies, each described as a general-purpose, 1,000-pound bomb body.

Check the sources
That the following proposed foreign military sale to Israel is prohibited:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31
two hundred one (201) MK 83 MOD 4/MOD 5 General Purpose 1,000-pound bomb bodies; four thousand seven hundred ninety-nine (4,799) BLU–110A/B General Purpose 1,000-pound bomb bodies
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31

The proposed prohibition also covers 1,500 KMU–559C/B and 3,500 KMU–559J/B Joint Direct Attack Munition guidance kits for MK 83 bomb bodies.

Check the sources
That the following proposed foreign military sale to Israel is prohibited:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31
one thousand five hundred (1,500) KMU–559C/B Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance kits for the MK 83 bomb body; and three thousand five hundred (3,500) KMU–559J/B JDAM guidance kits for the MK 83 bomb body.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-03-31

What the record shows

The supplied official-actions snapshot, updated July 3, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 31, 2025.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-07-03T08:05:39Z. 2025-03-31: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. 2025-03-31: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-07-03T08:05:39Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-31. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying earmark disclosures and committee materials were not supplied.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No narrow preferential benefit, special exemption, or carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The supplied history does not establish passage or enactment. Its lack of additional actions does not prove that the resolution never advanced or became law.
  • The referenced sale notification and Arms Export Control Act provision are not supplied, limiting assessment of the sale's broader terms and the surrounding statutory process.
  • The supplied resolution text specifies no separate implementation date, enforcement mechanism, exceptions, or expiration condition.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jul 3, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI